XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L
XCTE.L (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and XNGS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C) are both Technology Equities funds from DWS tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.L returned 13.51%/yr vs 30.68%/yr for XNGS.L. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCTE.L charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XNGS.L.
Performance
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCTE.L is traded in USD, while XNGS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the XNGS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCTE.L achieves a 5.37% return, which is significantly lower than XNGS.L's 17.30% return.
XCTE.L
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- 2.56%
- YTD
- 5.37%
- 6M
- 5.95%
- 1Y
- 28.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XNGS.L
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 11.75%
- YTD
- 17.30%
- 6M
- 16.40%
- 1Y
- 32.89%
- 3Y*
- 30.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C | 5.37% | 35.19% | 13.80% | -15.21% | -17.70% |
XNGS.L Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C | 17.30% | 20.06% | 35.79% | 56.70% | -12.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCTE.L and XNGS.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 21, 2022 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCTE.L
XNGS.L
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCTE.L | XNGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.31 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.62 | +0.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.63 | 4.48 | -0.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCTE.L | XNGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.83 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 1.33 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCTE.L drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, which is greater than XNGS.L's maximum drawdown of -24.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.L and XNGS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCTE.L | XNGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.79% | -24.31% | -18.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.77% | -20.19% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.93% | -24.31% | -8.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.90% | -1.62% | -3.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -5.12% | -14.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.72% | 7.32% | +0.40% |
Volatility
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Next Generation Internet Innovation UCITS ETF 1C (XNGS.L) at 5.47%. This indicates that XCTE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XNGS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCTE.L | XNGS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.72% | 5.47% | +3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.16% | 13.57% | +2.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.91% | 17.89% | +5.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 21.35% | +7.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.31% | 21.35% | +7.96% |
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCTE.L has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than XNGS.L's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCTE.L vs. XNGS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCTE.L nor XNGS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCTE.L and XNGS.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XNGS.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XNGS.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for XCTE.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.L and 0.35% for XNGS.L.
Find the right allocation for XCTE.L and XNGS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer