XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

XCTE.L (Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C) and DRVG.L (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing) are both Technology Equities funds tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, from DWS and Global X respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCTE.L returned 13.19%/yr vs 21.42%/yr for DRVG.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCTE.L charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DRVG.L.

Performance

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XCTE.L is traded in USD, while DRVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DRVG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCTE.L achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than DRVG.L's 41.98% return.

XCTE.L

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.34%
• 6M: 8.00%
• 1Y: 31.65%
• 3Y*: 13.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRVG.L

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 12.73%
• YTD: 41.98%
• 6M: 43.74%
• 1Y: 93.44%
• 3Y*: 21.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C	6.34%	35.19%	13.80%	-15.21%	-18.22%
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing	41.98%	29.52%	-5.72%	25.91%	-6.84%

Correlation

The correlation between XCTE.L and DRVG.L is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022	0.55

The correlation between XCTE.L and DRVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCTE.L	DRVG.L
Technology	30.8%	37.7%
Consumer Cyclical	22.7%	25.2%
Communication Services	13.9%	5.7%
Industrials	11.4%	18.0%
Basic Materials	10.0%	13.4%
Utilities	4.6%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	-
Financial Services	2.0%	-
Real Estate	1.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.3%	-
Energy	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCTE.L

XCTE.L Risk / Return Rank: 37
XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XCTE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
XCTE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 37
XCTE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XCTE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 29

DRVG.L

DRVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
DRVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
DRVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
DRVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DRVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCTE.L	DRVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	3.91	-2.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.01	4.82	-2.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.59	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.88	7.48	-5.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.09	23.43	-19.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCTE.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the DRVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCTE.L and DRVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCTE.L	DRVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	3.91	-2.53
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	0.27	-0.16

Drawdowns

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCTE.L drawdown since its inception was -42.79%, roughly equal to the maximum DRVG.L drawdown of -42.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCTE.L and DRVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCTE.L	DRVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.79%	-42.84%	+0.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.77%	-12.42%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-32.93%	-34.61%	+1.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	-0.75%	-3.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.16%	-21.47%	+2.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.72%	3.97%	+3.75%

Volatility

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C (XCTE.L) is 8.65%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing (DRVG.L) has a volatility of 9.37%. This indicates that XCTE.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCTE.L	DRVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.65%	9.37%	-0.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.14%	17.52%	-1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.90%	23.81%	-0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.33%	27.23%	+2.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.33%	27.23%	+2.10%

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCTE.L has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than DRVG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCTE.L vs. DRVG.L - Dividend Comparison

XCTE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRVG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRVG.L Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles UCITS ETF USD Distributing	0.43%	0.94%	0.58%	0.01%	0.01%
XCTE.L Xtrackers Harvest MSCI China Tech 100 UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCTE.L and DRVG.L in my portfolio?

XCTE.L and DRVG.L have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCTE.L or DRVG.L?

On fees, XCTE.L is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCTE.L or DRVG.L?

XCTE.L is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for DRVG.L.

What is the main difference between XCTE.L and DRVG.L?

Both ETFs track MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. They also come from different issuers: DWS and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for XCTE.L and 0.50% for DRVG.L.