XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS7.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 7.69%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 0.04% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
XDWH.DE
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.13 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 0.93 | -0.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 2.28 | -1.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 0.70 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.55 | -0.35 |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, which is greater than XDWH.DE's maximum drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -26.08% | -10.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -10.32% | -6.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -21.12% | -3.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | -8.51% | -6.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -4.82% | -10.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 4.20% | +3.98% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) at 4.81%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 4.81% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 9.51% | +3.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 13.69% | +4.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 13.43% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 14.69% | +10.96% |
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDWH.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDWH.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
XCS7.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer