XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and XDEW.DE (Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS7.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while XDEW.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 8.10%/yr vs 13.01%/yr for XDEW.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XDEW.DE.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -7.22% return, which is significantly lower than XDEW.DE's 14.89% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.42%
- 6M
- -12.42%
- YTD
- -7.22%
- 1Y
- 1.26%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDEW.DE
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- YTD
- 14.89%
- 1Y
- 23.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.59%
- 10Y*
- 11.13%
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -7.22% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 2.78% |
XDEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 14.89% | -0.46% | 18.66% | 10.08% | -4.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and XDEW.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
XDEW.DE
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCS7.DE | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.40 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 4.61 | -4.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.07 | 14.21 | -14.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum XDEW.DE drawdown of -38.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and XDEW.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -38.79% | +2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.82% | -5.06% | -24.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.82% | -22.70% | -7.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.70% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.52% | -0.27% | -24.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -5.33% | -11.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.92% | 1.64% | +16.28% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C (XDEW.DE) at 2.78%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDEW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | XDEW.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.47% | 2.78% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.70% | 6.93% | +6.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.82% | 10.66% | +17.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 14.91% | +12.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.35% | 16.80% | +10.55% |
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEW.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. XDEW.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%, while XDEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.12% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
XDEW.DE Xtrackers S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and XDEW.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XDEW.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XDEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for XCS7.DE.
XCS7.DE is categorized as China Equities, while XDEW.DE is S&P 500. XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while XDEW.DE tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Index. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.20% for XDEW.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and XDEW.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer