XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
XCS7.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - XCS7.DE tracks the MSCI China while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCS7.DE returned 7.69%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for 36BZ.DE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCS7.DE charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS7.DE achieves a -6.89% return, which is significantly lower than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return.
XCS7.DE
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- YTD
- -6.89%
- 6M
- -8.38%
- 1Y
- 2.79%
- 3Y*
- 7.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 12.94%
- 1Y
- 33.63%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | -6.89% | 16.53% | 27.49% | -14.73% | 4.09% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS7.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XCS7.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS7.DE
36BZ.DE
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS7.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.38 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 5.10 | -4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 13.77 | -13.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS7.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | 2.11 | -1.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.03 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS7.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.62%, smaller than the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS7.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS7.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.62% | -53.30% | +16.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.01% | -6.57% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.53% | -28.01% | +3.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.97% | -10.22% | -4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.59% | -30.19% | +14.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.18% | 2.44% | +5.74% |
Volatility
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.33% compared to iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) at 5.55%. This indicates that XCS7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS7.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.33% | 5.55% | +1.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 10.96% | +2.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 15.83% | +2.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 21.44% | +4.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 22.10% | +3.55% |
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS7.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS7.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%, while 36BZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCS7.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D | 2.11% | 2.35% | 2.05% | 3.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS7.DE and 36BZ.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for XCS7.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS7.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer