PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS6.DE vs. PG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XCS6.DE is traded in EUR, while PG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than PG's 5.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS6.DE has underperformed PG with an annualized return of 4.37%, while PG has yielded a comparatively higher 8.71% annualized return.


XCS6.DE

1D
-0.30%
1M
-3.42%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-9.67%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
7.21%
5Y*
-4.64%
10Y*
4.37%

PG

1D
4.93%
1M
1.04%
YTD
5.79%
6M
4.74%
1Y
-8.01%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCS6.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
-7.24%16.38%27.05%-15.14%-15.45%-17.27%15.11%26.93%-16.14%35.18%
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
5.79%-22.67%24.99%-3.83%0.84%29.54%4.74%42.86%8.43%-1.16%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS6.DE and PG is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2011

0.11

The correlation between XCS6.DE and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (5 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS6.DE vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS6.DE
XCS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PG
PG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
PG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
PG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
PG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
PG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCS6.DEPGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

0.94

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

-0.48

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.27

-0.83

+1.10

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the PG Sharpe Ratio of -0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS6.DE and PG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCS6.DEPGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

-0.44

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.29

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

0.44

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.43

-0.27

Drawdowns

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than PG's maximum drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and PG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS6.DEPGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.31%

-34.76%

-21.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.28%

-16.73%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.77%

-29.10%

+4.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.94%

-29.10%

-20.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.31%

-29.11%

-27.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.60%

-22.61%

-10.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.19%

-8.48%

-12.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.27%

9.68%

-1.41%

Volatility

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.50%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS6.DEPGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

7.50%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

15.21%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.53%

18.50%

+0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.67%

18.12%

+9.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.33%

19.70%

+5.63%

Dividends

XCS6.DE vs. PG - Dividend Comparison

XCS6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PG
The Procter & Gamble Company
2.91%2.91%2.36%2.55%2.38%2.08%2.24%2.37%3.09%2.98%3.18%3.31%
XCS6.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS6.DE and PG have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS6.DE and PG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer