XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L
XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) and EGLN.L (iShares Physical Gold ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XCS6.DE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while EGLN.L is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS6.DE returned -4.64%/yr vs 19.69%/yr for EGLN.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCS6.DE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for EGLN.L.
Performance
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than EGLN.L's 4.83% return.
XCS6.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- -7.24%
- 6M
- -9.67%
- 1Y
- 2.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.64%
- 10Y*
- 4.37%
EGLN.L
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 4.83%
- 6M
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 31.10%
- 3Y*
- 28.02%
- 5Y*
- 19.69%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C | -7.24% | 16.38% | 27.05% | -15.14% | -15.45% | -17.27% | 15.11% | 26.93% | -16.14% | 35.18% |
EGLN.L iShares Physical Gold ETC | 4.83% | 46.01% | 34.32% | 9.37% | 6.00% | 3.85% | 13.68% | 20.62% | 3.36% | -1.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS6.DE and EGLN.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2016 | 0.05 |
Over the past year, XCS6.DE and EGLN.L have become more correlated (0.30) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
XCS6.DE
EGLN.L
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS6.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.26 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.80 | -1.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 4.58 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS6.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | 1.30 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 1.22 | -1.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.95 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, which is greater than EGLN.L's maximum drawdown of -18.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and EGLN.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS6.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.31% | -18.35% | -37.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.28% | -16.70% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.77% | -16.70% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -49.94% | -16.70% | -33.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.60% | -15.21% | -18.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.19% | -6.34% | -14.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.27% | 6.57% | +1.70% |
Volatility
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.17% compared to iShares Physical Gold ETC (EGLN.L) at 5.42%. This indicates that XCS6.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS6.DE | EGLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.17% | 5.42% | +1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.14% | 20.15% | -7.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.53% | 23.14% | -4.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 16.17% | +11.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.33% | 14.38% | +10.95% |
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS6.DE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EGLN.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS6.DE vs. EGLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCS6.DE nor EGLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS6.DE and EGLN.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EGLN.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EGLN.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XCS6.DE.
XCS6.DE is categorized as China Equities, while EGLN.L is Gold. XCS6.DE tracks MSCI China, while EGLN.L tracks LBMA Gold Price. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for XCS6.DE and 0.25% for EGLN.L.
Find the right allocation for XCS6.DE and EGLN.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer