XCS6.DE vs. BABA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCS6.DE (Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C) is China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China, while BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XCS6.DE returned 4.37%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for BABA. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XCS6.DE is traded in EUR, while BABA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BABA values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS6.DE achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly higher than BABA's -15.79% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS6.DE has underperformed BABA with an annualized return of 4.37%, while BABA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.91% annualized return.

XCS6.DE

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: -7.24%
• 6M: -9.67%
• 1Y: 2.03%
• 3Y*: 7.21%
• 5Y*: -4.64%
• 10Y*: 4.37%

BABA

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: -12.72%
• YTD: -15.79%
• 6M: -22.73%
• 1Y: 1.94%
• 3Y*: 10.92%
• 5Y*: -9.28%
• 10Y*: 4.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C	-7.24%	16.38%	27.05%	-15.14%	-15.45%	-17.27%	15.11%	26.93%	-16.14%	35.18%
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	-15.79%	54.93%	19.15%	-13.50%	-21.25%	-45.14%	0.68%	58.23%	-16.78%	72.23%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS6.DE and BABA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2014	0.65

The correlation between XCS6.DE and BABA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XCS6.DE vs. BABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS6.DE

XCS6.DE Risk / Return Rank: 11
XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
XCS6.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
XCS6.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
XCS6.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
XCS6.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 10

BABA

BABA Risk / Return Rank: 42
BABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BABA Omega Ratio Rank: 39
BABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
BABA Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCS6.DE	BABA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.12	0.04	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.30	0.42	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.05	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.13	0.05	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	0.10	+0.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS6.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is higher than the BABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS6.DE and BABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCS6.DE	BABA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12	0.04	+0.08
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	-0.19	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17	0.11	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.09	+0.08

Drawdowns

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS6.DE drawdown since its inception was -56.31%, smaller than the maximum BABA drawdown of -76.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS6.DE and BABA.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCS6.DE	BABA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.31%	-76.43%	+20.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.28%	-36.11%	+18.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.77%	-36.11%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.94%	-67.12%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.31%	-76.43%	+20.12%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.60%	-58.87%	+25.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.19%	-34.74%	+13.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.27%	18.69%	-10.42%

Volatility

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C (XCS6.DE) is 7.17%, while Alibaba Group Holding Limited (BABA) has a volatility of 13.04%. This indicates that XCS6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCS6.DE	BABA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.17%	13.04%	-5.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.14%	28.74%	-15.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.53%	43.55%	-25.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.67%	50.21%	-22.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.33%	42.84%	-17.51%

Dividends

XCS6.DE vs. BABA - Dividend Comparison

XCS6.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BABA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Limited	1.65%	1.36%	1.96%	1.29%
XCS6.DE Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1C	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCS6.DE and BABA in my portfolio?

XCS6.DE and BABA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.