XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE
XCS5.DE (Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and LCUA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - XCS5.DE tracks the MSCI India while LCUA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCS5.DE returned 3.97%/yr vs 8.90%/yr for LCUA.DE. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCS5.DE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUA.DE.
Performance
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCS5.DE achieves a -11.32% return, which is significantly lower than LCUA.DE's 31.85% return.
XCS5.DE
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -1.71%
- YTD
- -11.32%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- -14.48%
- 3Y*
- 2.32%
- 5Y*
- 3.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.41%
LCUA.DE
- 1D
- -1.97%
- 1M
- 7.77%
- YTD
- 31.85%
- 6M
- 33.69%
- 1Y
- 54.70%
- 3Y*
- 22.72%
- 5Y*
- 8.90%
- 10Y*
- —
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCS5.DE Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C | -11.32% | -10.02% | 16.45% | 14.97% | -2.23% | 34.65% | 2.15% | 9.29% | 5.18% |
LCUA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc | 31.85% | 18.08% | 18.51% | 3.26% | -14.89% | 1.98% | 15.44% | 22.39% | -10.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCS5.DE and LCUA.DE is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018 | 0.54 |
The correlation between XCS5.DE and LCUA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCS5.DE
LCUA.DE
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCS5.DE) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCS5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.49 | -0.62 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.72 | 4.49 | -5.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 16.33 | -17.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCS5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | 2.72 | -3.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.48 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.48 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCS5.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.37%, which is greater than LCUA.DE's maximum drawdown of -33.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS5.DE and LCUA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCS5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.37% | -33.18% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.16% | -12.13% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.79% | -21.07% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.79% | -28.54% | -0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.66% | -2.86% | -22.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.00% | -12.02% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.73% | 3.34% | +6.39% |
Volatility
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI India Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCS5.DE) is 5.61%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Asia II UCITS ETF Acc (LCUA.DE) has a volatility of 8.54%. This indicates that XCS5.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCS5.DE | LCUA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 8.54% | -2.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.67% | 17.04% | -3.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.45% | 20.08% | -3.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 18.48% | -2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.39% | 19.46% | +0.93% |
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCS5.DE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUA.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCS5.DE vs. LCUA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCS5.DE nor LCUA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCS5.DE and LCUA.DE have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUA.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUA.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for XCS5.DE.
XCS5.DE tracks MSCI India, while LCUA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for XCS5.DE and 0.12% for LCUA.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCS5.DE and LCUA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer