PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCS3.DE achieves a 4.19% return, which is significantly lower than RQFI.DE's 11.19% return. Over the past 10 years, XCS3.DE has underperformed RQFI.DE with an annualized return of 1.97%, while RQFI.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 5.22% annualized return.


XCS3.DE

1D
1.39%
1M
-0.08%
6M
4.28%
YTD
4.19%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
1.97%

RQFI.DE

1D
0.75%
1M
0.00%
6M
9.79%
YTD
11.19%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
9.86%
5Y*
0.43%
10Y*
5.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XCS3.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)
4.19%3.11%26.75%-7.60%1.23%-1.02%-6.99%1.63%-1.88%9.03%
RQFI.DE
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D
11.19%11.14%22.23%-16.63%-21.95%7.70%24.38%37.47%-24.90%16.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2014

0.32

The correlation between XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCS3.DE
XCS3.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS3.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

RQFI.DE
RQFI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RQFI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCS3.DERQFI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.36

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

5.96

-3.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.95

14.95

-8.00

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCS3.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the RQFI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCS3.DE drawdown since its inception was -43.32%, smaller than the maximum RQFI.DE drawdown of -51.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCS3.DERQFI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.32%

-51.79%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.85%

-5.84%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-27.47%

+5.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.83%

-41.42%

+19.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.49%

-45.24%

+9.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.19%

-11.17%

+4.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.45%

-28.23%

+10.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.33%

+0.43%

Volatility

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc) (XCS3.DE) is 3.88%, while Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D (RQFI.DE) has a volatility of 7.49%. This indicates that XCS3.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RQFI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCS3.DERQFI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.88%

7.49%

-3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.90%

12.29%

-1.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

16.74%

-2.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

21.11%

-7.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

21.86%

-6.83%

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCS3.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RQFI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCS3.DE vs. RQFI.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCS3.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RQFI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RQFI.DE
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 UCITS ETF 1D
1.43%1.84%1.40%1.98%1.97%0.90%1.32%0.75%2.31%2.00%1.81%0.37%
XCS3.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Malaysia UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCS3.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCS3.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for RQFI.DE.

XCS3.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while RQFI.DE is China Equities. XCS3.DE tracks MSCI Malaysia Index, while RQFI.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCS3.DE and 0.65% for RQFI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCS3.DE and RQFI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer