PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOR vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCOR vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a 13.43% return, which is significantly lower than NACP's 22.18% return.


XCOR

1D
-0.71%
1M
7.51%
YTD
13.43%
6M
14.00%
1Y
29.47%
3Y*
22.94%
5Y*
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCOR vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCOR
Fundx ETF
13.43%12.50%29.57%14.34%7.11%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%2.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XCOR and NACP is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2022

0.90

The correlation between XCOR and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCOR vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCOR
NACP

Technology

39.0%
35.8%

Financial Services

12.7%
10.6%

Communication Services

12.2%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
11.1%

Healthcare

6.1%
9.2%

Industrials

5.4%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.6%

Energy

3.8%
5.0%

Utilities

2.4%
3.4%

Basic Materials

2.1%
1.5%

Real Estate

1.0%
1.3%

Technology

XCOR
39.0%
NACP
35.8%

Financial Services

XCOR
12.7%
NACP
10.6%

Communication Services

XCOR
12.2%
NACP
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XCOR
10.4%
NACP
11.1%

Healthcare

XCOR
6.1%
NACP
9.2%

Industrials

XCOR
5.4%
NACP
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

XCOR
4.9%
NACP
3.6%

Energy

XCOR
3.8%
NACP
5.0%

Utilities

XCOR
2.4%
NACP
3.4%

Basic Materials

XCOR
2.1%
NACP
1.5%

Real Estate

XCOR
1.0%
NACP
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCOR vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOR
XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOR vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCORNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

4.56

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.62

20.04

-6.42

XCOR vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOR and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCORNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

3.14

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.27

0.93

+0.34

Drawdowns

XCOR vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum NACP drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCORNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-30.96%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.60%

-9.65%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.54%

-19.66%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.13%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.12%

-5.75%

+2.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.19%

-0.02%

Volatility

XCOR vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundx ETF (XCOR) is 3.78%, while Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that XCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCORNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.44%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

11.13%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.84%

14.02%

-1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.05%

17.47%

-0.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

18.70%

-1.65%

XCOR vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCOR vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%
XCOR
Fundx ETF
0.38%0.43%0.00%0.95%2.52%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCOR and NACP have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NACP has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to XCOR (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCOR dropped -22.54% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 3-year performance, NACP leads with 27.18% vs 22.94% for XCOR. On fees, NACP is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, XCOR has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, NACP has performed better with a 27.18% return vs 22.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NACP is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for XCOR.

NACP has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.38% for XCOR.

They also come from different issuers: FundX and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.27% for XCOR and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCOR and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer