PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCOR vs. ATFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XCOR vs. ATFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCOR vs. ATFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCOR
Fundx ETF
-4.58%12.50%29.57%14.34%7.11%
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
-10.04%38.20%46.14%32.75%-1.51%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCOR achieves a -4.58% return, which is significantly higher than ATFV's -10.04% return.


XCOR

1D
3.10%
1M
-5.24%
YTD
-4.58%
6M
-1.67%
1Y
17.67%
3Y*
17.37%
5Y*
10Y*

ATFV

1D
4.80%
1M
-5.88%
YTD
-10.04%
6M
-11.50%
1Y
43.26%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XCOR vs. ATFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCOR has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than ATFV's 0.55% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

XCOR vs. ATFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCOR
XCOR Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
XCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

ATFV
ATFV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ATFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATFV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ATFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATFV Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCOR vs. ATFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fundx ETF (XCOR) and Alger 35 ETF (ATFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCORATFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

1.57

-0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.46

2.21

-0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.31

-0.88

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.78

8.03

-1.25

XCOR vs. ATFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCOR Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the ATFV Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCOR and ATFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCORATFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.57

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.38

+0.59

Correlation

The correlation between XCOR and ATFV is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XCOR vs. ATFV - Dividend Comparison

XCOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, more than ATFV's 0.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
XCOR
Fundx ETF
0.45%0.43%0.00%0.95%2.52%
ATFV
Alger 35 ETF
0.23%0.20%0.16%0.01%0.06%

Drawdowns

XCOR vs. ATFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCOR drawdown since its inception was -22.54%, smaller than the maximum ATFV drawdown of -45.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCOR and ATFV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XCORATFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.54%

-45.34%

+22.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-18.29%

+5.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.79%

-14.36%

+7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.22%

-18.36%

+15.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

5.27%

-2.62%

Volatility

XCOR vs. ATFV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fundx ETF (XCOR) is 6.08%, while Alger 35 ETF (ATFV) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that XCOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XCORATFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.08%

9.38%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

17.50%

-7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.52%

27.67%

-9.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

26.63%

-9.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

26.63%

-9.42%