XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
XCO2.DE (Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - XCO2.DE is a Global Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XCO2.DE returned -0.67%/yr vs 18.87%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCO2.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCO2.DE achieves a 0.67% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return.
XCO2.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 0.74%
- 1Y
- 1.74%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- -0.67%
- 10Y*
- —
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCO2.DE Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.67% | 1.13% | 4.41% | 5.82% | -15.31% | -2.31% | 3.85% | -2.24% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 20.65% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCO2.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2019 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, XCO2.DE and 6AQQ.DE have become more correlated (0.37) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCO2.DE
6AQQ.DE
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCO2.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.42 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.70 | 3.77 | -3.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.22 | 11.17 | -8.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCO2.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 | 2.41 | -1.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 | 0.94 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.16 | 1.08 | -1.24 |
Drawdowns
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCO2.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -31.19% | +13.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.36% | -10.01% | +7.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.45% | -26.73% | +24.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -31.19% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -0.84% | -6.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.62% | -5.36% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | 3.39% | -2.64% |
Volatility
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) is 0.81%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that XCO2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCO2.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.81% | 4.40% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.01% | 10.96% | -8.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55% | 15.66% | -13.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 19.83% | -14.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.25% | 19.63% | -14.38% |
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCO2.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCO2.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCO2.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCO2.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCO2.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCO2.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
XCO2.DE is categorized as Global Corporate Bonds, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. XCO2.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCO2.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCO2.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer