XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE).
XCO2.DE and 4UBP.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCO2.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD. It was launched on Sep 13, 2019. 4UBP.DE is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond. It was launched on Jun 24, 2020. Both XCO2.DE and 4UBP.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCO2.DE Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | -0.23% | 1.13% | 4.41% | 5.82% | -15.31% | -2.31% | 0.55% |
4UBP.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc | 0.37% | -2.18% | 6.73% | 5.80% | -13.17% | 3.83% | -2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCO2.DE achieves a -0.23% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBP.DE's 0.37% return.
XCO2.DE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -1.39%
- YTD
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- 1Y
- 0.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- -1.13%
- 10Y*
- —
4UBP.DE
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- YTD
- 0.37%
- 6M
- 0.81%
- 1Y
- -1.40%
- 3Y*
- 2.87%
- 5Y*
- 0.24%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCO2.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBP.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCO2.DE
4UBP.DE
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCO2.DE | 4UBP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.38 | -0.23 | +0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | -0.26 | +0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.96 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | -0.18 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.00 | -0.48 | +2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCO2.DE | 4UBP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 | -0.23 | +0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.23 | 0.04 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.19 | -0.06 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between XCO2.DE and 4UBP.DE is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCO2.DE nor 4UBP.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.90%, which is greater than 4UBP.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.DE and 4UBP.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCO2.DE | 4UBP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.90% | -15.13% | -2.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.36% | -5.45% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -15.13% | -2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.45% | -4.83% | -3.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.64% | -6.80% | -1.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.56% | 1.81% | -1.25% |
Volatility
XCO2.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) is 1.14%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that XCO2.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XCO2.DE | 4UBP.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.14% | 1.50% | -0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.72% | 2.98% | -1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.55% | 5.99% | -3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.88% | 6.56% | -1.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.29% | 6.50% | -1.21% |