PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCO2.DE achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than 36B7.DE's -0.71% return.


XCO2.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.16%
6M
0.31%
YTD
0.74%
1Y
1.97%
3Y*
3.66%
5Y*
-1.16%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-0.61%

36B7.DE

1D
-0.24%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.48%
YTD
-0.71%
1Y
1.67%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
-1.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XCO2.DE
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.74%1.12%4.38%5.87%-15.35%-2.28%3.83%-0.80%
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
-0.71%4.83%1.72%6.08%-16.05%-1.91%4.95%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2019

0.60

The correlation between XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCO2.DE
XCO2.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCO2.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

36B7.DE
36B7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) and iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCO2.DE36B7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.08

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.84

0.59

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.52

1.67

+0.85

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCO2.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is higher than the 36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCO2.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.88%, smaller than the maximum 36B7.DE drawdown of -21.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCO2.DE36B7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.88%

-21.83%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.33%

-2.81%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.47%

-4.56%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.24%

-21.62%

+4.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.57%

-7.86%

+0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-8.34%

-0.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

1.00%

-0.22%

Volatility

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (XCO2.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.23% compared to iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE) at 1.03%. This indicates that XCO2.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 36B7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCO2.DE36B7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.23%

1.03%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.27%

3.23%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78%

4.15%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.87%

5.70%

-0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.23%

6.46%

-1.23%

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCO2.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 36B7.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCO2.DE vs. 36B7.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCO2.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while 36B7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.12%4.01%3.87%3.23%2.71%2.07%1.19%0.94%
XCO2.DE
Lyxor Global Green Bond 1-10 Y (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCO2.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCO2.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for 36B7.DE.

XCO2.DE tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR USD, while 36B7.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Bond Index (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCO2.DE and 0.25% for 36B7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCO2.DE and 36B7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer