PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, 36B7.DE achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than 4UBP.DE's 2.76% return.


36B7.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.72%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.24%
1Y
2.17%
3Y*
3.77%
5Y*
-1.12%
10Y*

4UBP.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
1.62%
6M
2.83%
YTD
2.76%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
0.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
0.24%4.83%1.72%6.08%-16.05%-1.91%2.47%
4UBP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
2.76%-2.18%6.73%5.80%-13.17%3.83%-2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between 36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2020

0.53

The correlation between 36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.56 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

36B7.DE
36B7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
36B7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

4UBP.DE
4UBP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
4UBP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


36B7.DE4UBP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.20

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

0.35

+0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.26

0.46

+1.80

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current 36B7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.52, which is higher than the 4UBP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of 36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum 36B7.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.83%, which is greater than 4UBP.DE's maximum drawdown of -15.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for 36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


36B7.DE4UBP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.83%

-15.61%

-6.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.81%

-15.61%

+12.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.56%

-15.61%

+11.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-15.61%

-6.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.97%

-12.45%

+5.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-7.60%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

11.71%

-10.76%

Volatility

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (36B7.DE) is 0.91%, while UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc (4UBP.DE) has a volatility of 1.25%. This indicates that 36B7.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 4UBP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


36B7.DE4UBP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.25%

-0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

3.06%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.13%

21.67%

-17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.69%

11.47%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.47%

10.66%

-4.19%

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

36B7.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 4UBP.DE's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

36B7.DE vs. 4UBP.DE - Dividend Comparison

36B7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.08%, while 4UBP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
36B7.DE
iShares Global Corp Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.08%4.01%3.87%3.23%2.71%2.07%1.19%0.94%
4UBP.DE
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable UCITS ETF (USD) Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, 4UBP.DE is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

4UBP.DE is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for 36B7.DE.

36B7.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate Bond Index (EUR Hedged), while 4UBP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global Liquid Corporates Sustainable Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for 36B7.DE and 0.13% for 4UBP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for 36B7.DE and 4UBP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer