XCNY vs. SPYM
XCNY (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XCNY is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while SPYM is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCNY returned 30.73% vs 25.87% for SPYM. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCNY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for SPYM.
Performance
XCNY vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 14.37% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 8.48% return.
XCNY
- 1D
- -4.45%
- 1M
- -3.03%
- YTD
- 14.37%
- 6M
- 17.01%
- 1Y
- 30.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- -2.58%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 8.48%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
XCNY vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 14.37% | 20.42% | -3.51% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 8.48% | 17.79% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCNY and SPYM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.68 |
The correlation between XCNY and SPYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
XCNY vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XCNY
SPYM
Technology
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
Technology
XCNY
SPYM
Financial Services
XCNY
SPYM
Basic Materials
XCNY
SPYM
Industrials
XCNY
SPYM
Consumer Cyclical
XCNY
SPYM
Energy
XCNY
SPYM
Consumer Defensive
XCNY
SPYM
Communication Services
XCNY
SPYM
Utilities
XCNY
SPYM
Healthcare
XCNY
SPYM
Real Estate
XCNY
SPYM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCNY vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
XCNY
SPYM
XCNY vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCNY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 2.92 | -0.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.94 | 13.53 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCNY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 2.15 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.99 | 0.61 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
XCNY vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum SPYM drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCNY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.70% | -54.46% | +34.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.86% | -8.90% | -2.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.49% | -2.90% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.14% | -7.15% | +3.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 1.92% | +1.18% |
Volatility
XCNY vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) has a higher volatility of 7.62% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 3.73%. This indicates that XCNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCNY | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.62% | 3.73% | +3.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.21% | 9.30% | +5.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.22% | 12.09% | +5.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 16.83% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 18.02% | +0.02% |
XCNY vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCNY vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than SPYM's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.02% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF | 2.35% | 2.68% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCNY and SPYM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCNY has higher volatility (7.62%) compared to SPYM (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 30.73% vs 25.87% for SPYM. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 3.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 30.73% return vs 25.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCNY.
XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.02% for SPYM.
XCNY is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while SPYM is S&P 500. XCNY tracks S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.02% for SPYM.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCNY and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer