XCNY vs. RNEM

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

XCNY (SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF) and RNEM (First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - XCNY tracks the S&P Emerging ex-China BMI while RNEM tracks the Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, XCNY returned 29.12% vs 9.49% for RNEM. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. XCNY charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RNEM.

Performance

XCNY vs. RNEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCNY achieves a 16.46% return, which is significantly higher than RNEM's 4.10% return.

XCNY

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.00%
• 6M: 9.20%
• YTD: 16.46%
• 1Y: 29.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.10%

RNEM

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 4.17%
• 6M: 0.60%
• YTD: 4.10%
• 1Y: 9.49%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 5.66%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	$36.95K	$31.61K	$54.56K
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	$17.91K	$17.11K	$17.73K

XCNY vs. RNEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	16.46%	20.42%	-3.63%
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	4.10%	15.58%	-4.28%

Correlation

The correlation between XCNY and RNEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024	0.78

The correlation between XCNY and RNEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCNY vs. RNEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XCNY	RNEM
Technology	39.5%	6.5%
Financial Services	21.5%	36.0%
Basic Materials	7.9%	13.8%
Industrials	7.6%	4.1%
Consumer Cyclical	5.3%	10.0%
Energy	4.1%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	5.9%
Communication Services	3.3%	8.5%
Utilities	3.0%	3.4%
Healthcare	2.6%	4.5%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.8%

Return for Risk

XCNY vs. RNEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XCNY

XCNY Risk / Return Rank: 61
XCNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
XCNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XCNY Omega Ratio Rank: 60
XCNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
XCNY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

RNEM

RNEM Risk / Return Rank: 29
RNEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
RNEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
RNEM Omega Ratio Rank: 29
RNEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RNEM Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XCNY vs. RNEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) and First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XCNY	RNEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.53	0.76	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	1.16	+0.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.14	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.47	0.89	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.16	2.35	+5.81

XCNY vs. RNEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCNY Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the RNEM Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCNY and RNEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XCNY vs. RNEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCNY drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, smaller than the maximum RNEM drawdown of -38.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCNY and RNEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCNY	RNEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.70%	-38.38%	+18.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.86%	-10.71%	-1.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.09%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.41%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-2.19%	-3.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.14%	-9.22%	+5.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.58%	4.04%	-0.46%

Volatility

XCNY vs. RNEM - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) has a higher volatility of 7.03% compared to First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF (RNEM) at 3.09%. This indicates that XCNY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCNY	RNEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.03%	3.09%	+3.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.48%	10.83%	+6.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.17%	12.51%	+6.66%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.64%	14.47%	+4.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.64%	17.14%	+1.50%

XCNY vs. RNEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCNY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RNEM's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

XCNY vs. RNEM - Dividend Comparison

XCNY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%, which matches RNEM's 2.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RNEM First Trust Emerging Markets Equity Select ETF	2.28%	2.75%	3.45%	1.63%	2.99%	3.20%	3.01%	2.85%	2.85%	2.28%
XCNY SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF	2.30%	2.68%	1.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCNY and RNEM in my portfolio?

XCNY and RNEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XCNY or RNEM?

XCNY has higher volatility (7.03%) compared to RNEM (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCNY dropped -19.70% vs RNEM's -38.38%.

Which ETF is better, XCNY or RNEM?

On 1-year performance, XCNY leads with 29.12% vs 9.49% for RNEM. On fees, XCNY is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, RNEM has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XCNY or RNEM?

Over the 1-year period, XCNY has performed better with a 29.12% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCNY or RNEM?

XCNY is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RNEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XCNY or RNEM?

XCNY has the higher dividend yield at 2.30%, compared with 2.28% for RNEM.

What is the main difference between XCNY and RNEM?

XCNY tracks S&P Emerging ex-China BMI, while RNEM tracks Nasdaq Riskalyze Emerging Markets Equity Select Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCNY and 0.75% for RNEM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XCNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.