XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and XAAG.DE (Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both Commodities funds - XCMC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while XAAG.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCMC.DE returned 11.29%/yr vs 17.71%/yr for XAAG.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.19% expense ratio.

Performance

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XCMC.DE having a 28.51% return and XAAG.DE slightly lower at 27.69%.

XCMC.DE

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: -1.31%
• YTD: 28.51%
• 6M: 19.96%
• 1Y: 29.14%
• 3Y*: 11.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAAG.DE

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: 0.44%
• YTD: 27.69%
• 6M: 30.58%
• 1Y: 47.37%
• 3Y*: 17.71%
• 5Y*: 14.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C	28.51%	-2.66%	11.92%	-9.34%	24.84%	-11.32%
XAAG.DE Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc	27.69%	12.13%	14.84%	-14.76%	23.35%	-2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021	0.88

The correlation between XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCMC.DE

XCMC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 54
XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
XCMC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
XCMC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XCMC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
XCMC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 51

XAAG.DE

XAAG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 65
XAAG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
XAAG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
XAAG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 65
XAAG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
XAAG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCMC.DE	XAAG.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	2.17	-0.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.65	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.39	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.72	4.08	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.44	9.65	-1.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCMC.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the XAAG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCMC.DE	XAAG.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.66	2.17	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.73	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.49	-0.04

Drawdowns

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum XAAG.DE drawdown of -33.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCMC.DE	XAAG.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.91%	-33.85%	+10.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.80%	-11.54%	+3.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.82%	-16.26%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.42%	-2.54%	-0.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.68%	-13.88%	+1.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	4.89%	-1.44%

Volatility

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Invesco Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (XAAG.DE) have volatilities of 4.94% and 4.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCMC.DE	XAAG.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.94%	4.71%	+0.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.31%	18.81%	-3.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.48%	21.76%	-4.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.33%	20.32%	-2.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.33%	18.40%	-1.07%

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE have an expense ratio of 0.19%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XCMC.DE vs. XAAG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither XCMC.DE nor XAAG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE in my portfolio?

XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XCMC.DE or XAAG.DE?

Both ETFs have the same 0.19% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCMC.DE or XAAG.DE?

XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.19% per year.

What is the main difference between XCMC.DE and XAAG.DE?

XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while XAAG.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture and Livestock. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Invesco.