XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE
XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and LYMD.DE (Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XCMC.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while LYMD.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI India. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCMC.DE returned 11.29%/yr vs 1.77%/yr for LYMD.DE. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCMC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for LYMD.DE.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly higher than LYMD.DE's -11.03% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LYMD.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -1.73%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -11.93%
- 1Y
- -14.67%
- 3Y*
- 1.77%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 6.18%
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc | -11.03% | -10.62% | 15.81% | 14.99% | -2.96% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and LYMD.DE is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.06 |
The correlation between XCMC.DE and LYMD.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
LYMD.DE
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.86 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | -0.71 | +4.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | -1.49 | +9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | -0.91 | +2.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.17 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum LYMD.DE drawdown of -68.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and LYMD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -68.71% | +45.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -20.60% | +12.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -29.55% | +14.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.55% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -26.17% | +22.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -18.32% | +5.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 9.84% | -6.39% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) is 4.94%, while Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) has a volatility of 5.64%. This indicates that XCMC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LYMD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | LYMD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 5.64% | -0.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 13.24% | +2.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 16.06% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 16.15% | +1.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 20.15% | -2.82% |
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than LYMD.DE's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. LYMD.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCMC.DE nor LYMD.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCMC.DE and LYMD.DE have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
XCMC.DE is categorized as Commodities, while LYMD.DE is Asia Pacific Equities. XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while LYMD.DE tracks MSCI India. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.85% for LYMD.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and LYMD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer