XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE
XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and GSDE.DE (BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR) are both Commodities funds - XCMC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while GSDE.DE tracks the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCMC.DE returned 11.29%/yr vs 15.82%/yr for GSDE.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCMC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GSDE.DE.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly higher than GSDE.DE's 23.86% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.13%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GSDE.DE
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -0.24%
- YTD
- 23.86%
- 6M
- 26.63%
- 1Y
- 44.74%
- 3Y*
- 15.82%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
GSDE.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR | 23.86% | 13.74% | 14.93% | -12.88% | 21.59% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and GSDE.DE is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XCMC.DE and GSDE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
GSDE.DE
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.43 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 5.65 | -1.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 12.60 | -4.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.37 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.09 | +0.36 |
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum GSDE.DE drawdown of -68.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and GSDE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -68.91% | +46.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -7.89% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -15.25% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -6.40% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -44.09% | +31.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.54% | -0.09% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (GSDE.DE) at 4.51%. This indicates that XCMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSDE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | GSDE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.51% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 16.35% | -1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 18.80% | -1.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 17.84% | -0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.76% | +1.57% |
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than GSDE.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. GSDE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCMC.DE nor GSDE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCMC.DE and GSDE.DE have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GSDE.DE.
XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while GSDE.DE tracks BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.39% for GSDE.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and GSDE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer