XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE
XCMC.DE (Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and BCFU.DE (UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc) are both Commodities funds - XCMC.DE tracks the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward while BCFU.DE tracks the UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCMC.DE returned 11.29%/yr vs 11.53%/yr for BCFU.DE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCMC.DE charges 0.19%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for BCFU.DE.
Performance
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XCMC.DE is traded in EUR, while BCFU.DE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the BCFU.DE values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCMC.DE achieves a 28.51% return, which is significantly higher than BCFU.DE's 19.04% return.
XCMC.DE
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 28.51%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCFU.DE
- 1D
- -1.32%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- 19.04%
- 6M
- 20.49%
- 1Y
- 30.38%
- 3Y*
- 11.53%
- 5Y*
- 13.04%
- 10Y*
- —
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCMC.DE Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 28.51% | -2.66% | 11.92% | -9.34% | 24.84% | -11.32% |
BCFU.DE UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc | 19.04% | 5.83% | 11.25% | -8.45% | 23.71% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCMC.DE and BCFU.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.89 |
The correlation between XCMC.DE and BCFU.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCMC.DE
BCFU.DE
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) and UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCMC.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.35 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.72 | 4.30 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.44 | 9.99 | -1.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCMC.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 1.98 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.76 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.62 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.91%, smaller than the maximum BCFU.DE drawdown of -25.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCMC.DE and BCFU.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCMC.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.91% | -25.15% | +2.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.80% | -7.03% | -0.77% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.82% | -13.93% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.42% | -3.51% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.68% | -11.04% | -1.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 3.03% | +0.42% |
Volatility
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCMC.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.94% compared to UBS ETFs (IE) Bloomberg Commodity CMCI SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (BCFU.DE) at 4.47%. This indicates that XCMC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCFU.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCMC.DE | BCFU.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 4.47% | +0.47% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.31% | 12.82% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 15.29% | +2.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 16.95% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 15.33% | +2.00% |
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCMC.DE has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than BCFU.DE's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCMC.DE vs. BCFU.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCMC.DE nor BCFU.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XCMC.DE and BCFU.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCMC.DE is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
XCMC.DE tracks Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while BCFU.DE tracks UBS BCOM Constant Maturity. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for XCMC.DE and 0.34% for BCFU.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCMC.DE and BCFU.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer