PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 19.48% return, which is significantly higher than ZPDW.DE's 16.76% return.


XCJD.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
13.22%
YTD
19.48%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
13.64%
5Y*
10Y*

ZPDW.DE

1D
-2.48%
1M
-4.34%
6M
9.40%
YTD
16.76%
1Y
43.91%
3Y*
25.04%
5Y*
19.19%
10Y*
14.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
19.48%10.38%7.06%-0.50%
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
16.76%27.50%22.78%26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2023

0.79

The correlation between XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCJD.DE
XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ZPDW.DE
ZPDW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZPDW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XCJD.DEZPDW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.39

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

4.53

-2.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.39

14.78

-10.39

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the ZPDW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum ZPDW.DE drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCJD.DEZPDW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-34.37%

+17.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.78%

-9.65%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-21.70%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.20%

-6.47%

+4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.10%

-7.46%

+2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

2.96%

+4.77%

Volatility

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 6.04%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF (ZPDW.DE) has a volatility of 6.94%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZPDW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCJD.DEZPDW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

6.94%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.74%

16.62%

-0.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.56%

20.76%

+7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.83%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.48%

18.45%

+2.03%

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ZPDW.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCJD.DE vs. ZPDW.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while ZPDW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
1.35%1.55%2.21%2.27%
ZPDW.DE
State Street SPDR MSCI Japan EUR Hdg UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCJD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCJD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for ZPDW.DE.

XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while ZPDW.DE tracks MSCI Japan 100% Hedged to EUR Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.17% for ZPDW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and ZPDW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer