XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE
XCJD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and XDWH.DE (Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C) are both exchange-traded funds - XCJD.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while XDWH.DE is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCJD.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 2.67%/yr for XDWH.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCJD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XDWH.DE.
Performance
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than XDWH.DE's -1.98% return.
XCJD.DE
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 5.00%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 13.84%
- 1Y
- 25.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XDWH.DE
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -1.54%
- 1Y
- 9.60%
- 3Y*
- 2.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.50%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 14.53% | 10.16% | 6.89% | 6.37% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | -1.98% | 2.21% | 7.44% | 4.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCJD.DE and XDWH.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCJD.DE
XDWH.DE
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCJD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.13 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.44 | 0.93 | +1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.19 | 2.28 | +5.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCJD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.70 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.51 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.55 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum XDWH.DE drawdown of -26.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and XDWH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCJD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.48% | -26.08% | +9.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.52% | -10.32% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.48% | -21.12% | +4.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -26.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.41% | -8.51% | +8.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -4.82% | +1.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.20% | -1.05% |
Volatility
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 3.70%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C (XDWH.DE) has a volatility of 4.81%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDWH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCJD.DE | XDWH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.81% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.79% | 9.51% | +5.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.65% | 13.69% | +4.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 13.43% | +3.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.01% | 14.69% | +2.32% |
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWH.DE's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XCJD.DE vs. XDWH.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while XDWH.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF | 1.21% | 1.36% | 2.05% | 1.42% |
XDWH.DE Xtrackers MSCI World Health Care UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCJD.DE and XDWH.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCJD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCJD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
XCJD.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while XDWH.DE is Health & Biotech Equities. XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while XDWH.DE tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.25% for XDWH.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and XDWH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer