XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

XCJD.DE (Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF) and LCUJ.DE (Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc) are both Japan Equities funds - XCJD.DE tracks the MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB while LCUJ.DE tracks the MSCI Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XCJD.DE returned 10.79%/yr vs 15.71%/yr for LCUJ.DE. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XCJD.DE charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for LCUJ.DE.

Performance

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than LCUJ.DE's 17.36% return.

XCJD.DE

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 13.84%
• 1Y: 25.82%
• 3Y*: 10.79%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LCUJ.DE

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 6.48%
• YTD: 17.36%
• 6M: 17.18%
• 1Y: 31.24%
• 3Y*: 15.71%
• 5Y*: 10.17%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF	14.53%	10.16%	6.89%	6.37%
LCUJ.DE Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	17.36%	12.70%	13.58%	8.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023	0.97

The correlation between XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCJD.DE

XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 45
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 42
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

LCUJ.DE

LCUJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 53
LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
LCUJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
LCUJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 50
LCUJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
LCUJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XCJD.DE	LCUJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	2.46	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.31	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	3.00	-0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.19	9.68	-1.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the LCUJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XCJD.DE	LCUJ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	1.61	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.69	0.52	+0.17

Drawdowns

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum LCUJ.DE drawdown of -28.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	XCJD.DE	LCUJ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.48%	-28.01%	+11.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.52%	-10.08%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.48%	-16.92%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.10%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.41%	0.00%	-0.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.78%	-5.92%	+2.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.15%	3.13%	+0.02%

Volatility

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 3.70%, while Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc (LCUJ.DE) has a volatility of 4.13%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LCUJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XCJD.DE	LCUJ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	4.13%	-0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.79%	14.92%	-0.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.65%	18.78%	-0.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.01%	16.63%	+0.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.01%	17.10%	-0.09%

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XCJD.DE vs. LCUJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while LCUJ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LCUJ.DE Amundi MSCI Japan UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XCJD.DE Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF	1.21%	1.36%	2.05%	1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, XCJD.DE or LCUJ.DE?

On fees, LCUJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XCJD.DE or LCUJ.DE?

LCUJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for XCJD.DE.

What is the main difference between XCJD.DE and LCUJ.DE?

XCJD.DE tracks MSCI Japan Select Sustainability Screened CTB, while LCUJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.12% for LCUJ.DE.