PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCJD.DE achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly lower than 3JPN.DE's 37.51% return.


XCJD.DE

1D
-0.41%
1M
5.00%
YTD
14.53%
6M
13.84%
1Y
25.82%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
10Y*

3JPN.DE

1D
-0.77%
1M
15.49%
YTD
37.51%
6M
33.89%
1Y
68.56%
3Y*
20.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
14.53%10.16%6.89%6.37%
3JPN.DE
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities
37.51%27.74%0.10%15.91%

Correlation

The correlation between XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.90

The correlation between XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCJD.DE
XCJD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCJD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

3JPN.DE
3JPN.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
3JPN.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) and Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCJD.DE3JPN.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.23

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.44

1.96

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.19

5.61

+2.58

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCJD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the 3JPN.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCJD.DE3JPN.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.13

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.69

0.50

+0.19

Drawdowns

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCJD.DE drawdown since its inception was -16.48%, smaller than the maximum 3JPN.DE drawdown of -51.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCJD.DE3JPN.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.48%

-51.65%

+35.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-34.71%

+24.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.48%

-51.65%

+35.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-7.07%

+6.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.78%

-14.56%

+10.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

12.19%

-9.04%

Volatility

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF (XCJD.DE) is 3.70%, while Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities (3JPN.DE) has a volatility of 11.68%. This indicates that XCJD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 3JPN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCJD.DE3JPN.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

11.68%

-7.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.79%

48.68%

-33.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.65%

60.28%

-41.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.01%

52.77%

-35.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

52.77%

-35.76%

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCJD.DE has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than 3JPN.DE's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCJD.DE vs. 3JPN.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCJD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, while 3JPN.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
3JPN.DE
Leverage Shares 3x Long Japan ETP Securities
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCJD.DE
Xtrackers MSCI Japan Climate Transition UCITS ETF
1.21%1.36%2.05%1.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XCJD.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCJD.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.

XCJD.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while 3JPN.DE is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XCJD.DE and 0.75% for 3JPN.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCJD.DE and 3JPN.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer