PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than XCS7.DE's -6.89% return.


XCHA.DE

1D
-0.47%
1M
2.18%
YTD
12.47%
6M
14.40%
1Y
39.55%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
3.01%
10Y*
9.08%

XCS7.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
-6.89%
6M
-9.34%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
7.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
12.47%14.69%24.35%-14.26%1.94%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
-6.89%16.53%27.49%-14.73%4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022

0.74

The correlation between XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCHA.DE
XCHA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCHA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank

XCS7.DE
XCS7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCS7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCHA.DEXCS7.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.04

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

0.16

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

0.34

+4.28

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCHA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the XCS7.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCHA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.15

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.20

+0.11

Drawdowns

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than XCS7.DE's maximum drawdown of -36.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCHA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.27%

-36.62%

-15.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.43%

-17.01%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-24.53%

-1.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-14.97%

+13.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.73%

-15.59%

-7.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.48%

8.18%

+0.30%

Volatility

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) is 5.10%, while Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D (XCS7.DE) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that XCHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCS7.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCHA.DEXCS7.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.10%

7.33%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

13.19%

-2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.51%

18.48%

+8.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.27%

25.65%

-2.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.20%

25.65%

-2.45%

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than XCS7.DE's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCHA.DE vs. XCS7.DE - Dividend Comparison

XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XCS7.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.11%.


PositionTTM202520242023
XCHA.DE
Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCS7.DE
Xtrackers MSCI China UCITS ETF 1D
2.11%2.35%2.05%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XCS7.DE is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XCS7.DE is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.

XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while XCS7.DE tracks MSCI China. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.28% for XCS7.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and XCS7.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer