XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE
XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and IQQC.DE (iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while IQQC.DE tracks the FTSE China 50. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE returned 9.08%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for IQQC.DE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XCHA.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IQQC.DE.
Performance
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than IQQC.DE's -7.00% return. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE has outperformed IQQC.DE with an annualized return of 9.08%, while IQQC.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 2.69% annualized return.
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
IQQC.DE
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -9.66%
- 1Y
- -2.21%
- 3Y*
- 8.94%
- 5Y*
- -2.24%
- 10Y*
- 2.69%
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 44.98% | -21.84% | 18.89% |
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | -7.00% | 14.32% | 39.12% | -16.33% | -13.36% | -15.34% | -1.10% | 18.05% | -9.09% | 18.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHA.DE and IQQC.DE is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2012 | 0.69 |
The correlation between XCHA.DE and IQQC.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCHA.DE
IQQC.DE
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCHA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.00 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | -0.11 | +2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | -0.23 | +4.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | -0.09 | +1.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.08 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.11 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.17 | +0.14 |
Drawdowns
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, smaller than the maximum IQQC.DE drawdown of -67.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and IQQC.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -67.50% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.43% | -15.24% | -1.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -27.71% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -47.35% | +10.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -53.92% | +15.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -24.02% | +22.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -28.16% | +5.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 7.16% | +1.32% |
Volatility
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) is 5.10%, while iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF (IQQC.DE) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that XCHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQC.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHA.DE | IQQC.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 6.75% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 12.55% | -2.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 17.72% | +8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 28.20% | -4.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 25.07% | -1.87% |
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQC.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHA.DE vs. IQQC.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQC.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQC.DE iShares China Large Cap UCITS ETF | 1.92% | 1.78% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.51% | 1.85% | 2.51% | 2.45% | 3.03% | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.63% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHA.DE and IQQC.DE have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCHA.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCHA.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while IQQC.DE tracks FTSE China 50. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.74% for IQQC.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and IQQC.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer