XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE
XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and AH50.DE (Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D) are both China Equities funds from Xtrackers - XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while AH50.DE tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE returned 9.08%/yr vs 8.17%/yr for AH50.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHA.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AH50.DE.
Performance
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly lower than AH50.DE's 13.38% return. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE has outperformed AH50.DE with an annualized return of 9.08%, while AH50.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.17% annualized return.
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
AH50.DE
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 13.38%
- 6M
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 31.49%
- 3Y*
- 12.81%
- 5Y*
- 1.06%
- 10Y*
- 8.17%
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 44.98% | -21.84% | 18.89% |
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 13.38% | 11.41% | 26.06% | -15.94% | -16.05% | 2.97% | 14.92% | 41.09% | -16.54% | 20.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHA.DE and AH50.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2016 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XCHA.DE and AH50.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCHA.DE
AH50.DE
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCHA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 4.40 | -2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 12.99 | -8.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 1.83 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.05 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.36 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.35 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, which is greater than AH50.DE's maximum drawdown of -45.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and AH50.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -45.20% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.43% | -7.15% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -25.16% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -38.11% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -45.20% | +6.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -5.93% | +4.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -16.78% | -5.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 2.43% | +6.05% |
Volatility
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) is 5.10%, while Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D (AH50.DE) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that XCHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AH50.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHA.DE | AH50.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.94% | -0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 12.32% | -1.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 17.18% | +9.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 23.21% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 22.82% | +0.38% |
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AH50.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHA.DE vs. AH50.DE - Dividend Comparison
XCHA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AH50.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AH50.DE Xtrackers Harvest FTSE China A-H 50 UCITS ETF 1D | 2.07% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.80% | 3.06% | 1.67% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 2.56% | 2.44% |
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCHA.DE and AH50.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XCHA.DE is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XCHA.DE is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for AH50.DE.
XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while AH50.DE tracks MSCI China NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.65% for AH50.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and AH50.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer