XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE
XCHA.DE (Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C) and 36BZ.DE (iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF) are both China Equities funds - XCHA.DE tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while 36BZ.DE tracks the MSCI China A Inclusion. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE returned 9.08%/yr vs 5.98%/yr for 36BZ.DE. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XCHA.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for 36BZ.DE.
Performance
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCHA.DE achieves a 12.47% return, which is significantly higher than 36BZ.DE's 9.71% return. Over the past 10 years, XCHA.DE has outperformed 36BZ.DE with an annualized return of 9.08%, while 36BZ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.98% annualized return.
XCHA.DE
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 14.40%
- 1Y
- 39.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.45%
- 5Y*
- 3.01%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
36BZ.DE
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 9.71%
- 6M
- 11.84%
- 1Y
- 33.04%
- 3Y*
- 8.44%
- 5Y*
- -0.23%
- 10Y*
- 5.98%
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCHA.DE Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C | 12.47% | 14.69% | 24.35% | -14.26% | -19.18% | 13.33% | 31.24% | 44.98% | -21.84% | 18.89% |
36BZ.DE iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF | 9.71% | 10.25% | 19.91% | -17.13% | -21.26% | 13.41% | 28.50% | 37.21% | -23.49% | 14.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCHA.DE and 36BZ.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015 | 0.94 |
The correlation between XCHA.DE and 36BZ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
XCHA.DE
36BZ.DE
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) and iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XCHA.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.38 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.38 | 5.10 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.62 | 13.77 | -9.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XCHA.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.48 | 2.11 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | -0.01 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.27 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.03 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCHA.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.27%, roughly equal to the maximum 36BZ.DE drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCHA.DE and 36BZ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCHA.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.27% | -53.30% | +1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.43% | -6.57% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.32% | -28.01% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.07% | -41.94% | +4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.55% | -43.38% | +4.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.81% | -10.22% | +8.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -30.19% | +7.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.48% | 2.44% | +6.04% |
Volatility
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Xtrackers CSI 300 Swap UCITS ETF 1C (XCHA.DE) is 5.10%, while iShares MSCI China A UCITS ETF (36BZ.DE) has a volatility of 5.55%. This indicates that XCHA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 36BZ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCHA.DE | 36BZ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.10% | 5.55% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.37% | 10.96% | -0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.51% | 15.83% | +10.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.27% | 21.44% | +1.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.20% | 22.10% | +1.10% |
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCHA.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than 36BZ.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCHA.DE vs. 36BZ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither XCHA.DE nor 36BZ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XCHA.DE and 36BZ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, 36BZ.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
36BZ.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XCHA.DE.
XCHA.DE tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while 36BZ.DE tracks MSCI China A Inclusion. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for XCHA.DE and 0.40% for 36BZ.DE.
Find the right allocation for XCHA.DE and 36BZ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer