XCEM vs. UGA
XCEM (Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - XCEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XCEM returned 12.62%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XCEM charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
XCEM vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 34.20% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XCEM has underperformed UGA with an annualized return of 12.62%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively higher 14.31% annualized return.
XCEM
- 1D
- -6.33%
- 1M
- 4.21%
- YTD
- 34.20%
- 6M
- 36.41%
- 1Y
- 61.17%
- 3Y*
- 24.94%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
XCEM vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 34.20% | 34.05% | 0.42% | 19.96% | -17.59% | 7.87% | 9.47% | 19.74% | -11.75% | 34.78% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XCEM and UGA is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015 | 0.20 |
The correlation between XCEM and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XCEM vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
XCEM
UGA
XCEM vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XCEM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.30 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.25 | 3.17 | +1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.39 | 9.39 | +7.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XCEM vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XCEM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.24% | -86.59% | +45.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.46% | -18.96% | +4.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.92% | -26.68% | +7.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.57% | -38.11% | +8.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.24% | -75.89% | +34.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.33% | -18.05% | +11.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.57% | -36.69% | +28.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 6.43% | -2.69% |
Volatility
XCEM vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a higher volatility of 14.01% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that XCEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XCEM | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.01% | 9.24% | +4.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.56% | 30.57% | -8.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.28% | 35.22% | -10.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.60% | 34.45% | -15.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 37.22% | -17.28% |
XCEM vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
XCEM vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XCEM Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF | 2.42% | 3.25% | 2.76% | 1.22% | 2.42% | 1.94% | 1.63% | 2.11% | 2.70% | 9.56% | 1.24% | 2.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XCEM and UGA have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XCEM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCEM dropped -41.24% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, UGA leads with 14.31% vs 12.62% for XCEM. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, UGA has performed better with a 14.31% return vs 12.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
XCEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XCEM and 0.75% for UGA.
XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XCEM and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer