PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCEM vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCEM achieves a 38.32% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 47.29% return.


XCEM

1D
-1.25%
1M
12.13%
YTD
38.32%
6M
44.13%
1Y
71.14%
3Y*
26.37%
5Y*
11.95%
10Y*
12.99%

STXE

1D
-1.00%
1M
15.10%
YTD
47.29%
6M
52.92%
1Y
84.40%
3Y*
29.77%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
38.32%34.05%0.42%11.54%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
47.29%34.23%2.09%11.74%

Correlation

The correlation between XCEM and STXE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2023

0.92

The correlation between XCEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

XCEM vs. STXE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XCEM
STXE

Financial Services

7.7%
22.5%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.2%

Utilities

1.9%
2.0%

Technology

1.1%
47.7%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
4.0%

Basic Materials

0.7%
7.1%

Industrials

0.4%
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.3%
2.2%

Energy

0.2%
3.9%

Healthcare

0.1%
1.1%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.4%

Financial Services

XCEM
7.7%
STXE
22.5%

Communication Services

XCEM
4.2%
STXE
3.2%

Utilities

XCEM
1.9%
STXE
2.0%

Technology

XCEM
1.1%
STXE
47.7%

Consumer Cyclical

XCEM
1.1%
STXE
4.0%

Basic Materials

XCEM
0.7%
STXE
7.1%

Industrials

XCEM
0.4%
STXE
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

XCEM
0.3%
STXE
2.2%

Energy

XCEM
0.2%
STXE
3.9%

Healthcare

XCEM
0.1%
STXE
1.1%

Real Estate

XCEM
0.0%
STXE
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCEM
XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCEMSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.65

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.95

5.85

-0.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.98

23.95

-3.97

XCEM vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCEM Sharpe Ratio is 3.42, which is comparable to the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCEM and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCEMSTXEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42

3.70

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

1.57

-0.94

Drawdowns

XCEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCEM drawdown since its inception was -41.24%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCEM and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCEMSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.24%

-18.92%

-22.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.46%

-14.51%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.92%

-18.92%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-1.00%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.59%

-3.72%

-4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.57%

3.54%

+0.03%

Volatility

XCEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) is 9.43%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 10.53%. This indicates that XCEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCEMSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.43%

10.53%

-1.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.72%

20.81%

-2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.89%

22.95%

-2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

17.68%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.72%

17.68%

+2.04%

XCEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCEM has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

XCEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

XCEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, more than STXE's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.83%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
2.35%3.25%2.76%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%2.70%9.56%1.24%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, XCEM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (10.53%) compared to XCEM (9.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XCEM dropped -41.24% vs STXE's -18.92%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 29.77% vs 26.37% for XCEM. On fees, XCEM is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, XCEM has been the lower-risk option at 9.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 29.77% return vs 26.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XCEM is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for STXE.

XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 1.83% for STXE.

XCEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while STXE is Emerging Markets Diversified. XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index, while STXE tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Dividend Growth Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Ameriprise Financial and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for XCEM and 0.32% for STXE.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCEM and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer