PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCBG.TO achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly higher than XIGS.TO's -0.14% return.


XCBG.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.47%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.49%
1Y
3.86%
3Y*
5.93%
5Y*
10Y*

XIGS.TO

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.08%
YTD
-0.14%
6M
-0.01%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
1.59%4.21%6.79%7.45%-7.40%-1.10%
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
-0.14%4.82%3.76%5.39%-5.89%-1.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2021

0.42

The correlation between XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XCBG.TO
XCBG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XIGS.TO
XIGS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
XIGS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XCBG.TOXIGS.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.21

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

1.58

+0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.93

4.82

+1.10

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the XIGS.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XCBG.TOXIGS.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31

1.07

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.40

+0.13

Drawdowns

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCBG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, which is greater than XIGS.TO's maximum drawdown of -10.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XCBG.TOXIGS.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-10.12%

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.03%

-1.60%

-0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.26%

-1.60%

-0.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-0.86%

+0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.53%

-2.92%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.65%

0.52%

+0.13%

Volatility

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) has a higher volatility of 1.07% compared to iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged) (XIGS.TO) at 0.95%. This indicates that XCBG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XIGS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XCBG.TOXIGS.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.07%

0.95%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.37%

1.59%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95%

2.36%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.21%

3.31%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.21%

3.31%

+0.90%

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCBG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than XIGS.TO's 0.16% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XCBG.TO vs. XIGS.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCBG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than XIGS.TO's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
3.93%3.84%3.61%3.19%2.99%0.87%
XIGS.TO
iShares 1-5 Year U.S. IG Corporate Bond Index ETF (CAD-Hedged)
4.47%4.10%3.71%3.03%1.75%0.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XIGS.TO is cheaper at 0.16% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XIGS.TO is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for XCBG.TO.

XCBG.TO tracks Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD, while XIGS.TO tracks ICE BofA 1-5 Year US Corporate Index (CAD-Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.17% for XCBG.TO and 0.16% for XIGS.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XCBG.TO and XIGS.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer