PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO).

XCBG.TO and ZAG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XCBG.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Can Corp Bd GR CAD. It was launched on Aug 6, 2021. ZAG.TO is a passively managed fund by BMO that tracks the performance of the FTSE Canada Universe Bond Index. It was launched on Jan 19, 2010. Both XCBG.TO and ZAG.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		0.14%4.21%6.79%7.45%-7.40%-1.10%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF		0.04%2.25%4.48%6.41%-11.60%-0.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XCBG.TO achieves a 0.14% return, which is significantly higher than ZAG.TO's 0.04% return.

XCBG.TO

1D
0.16%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
0.14%
6M
0.34%
1Y
2.70%
3Y*
5.37%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

ZAG.TO

1D
0.15%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
0.56%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
0.58%
10Y*
1.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF

BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Often compared with XCBG.TO:
XCBG.TO vs. XCB.TOXCBG.TO vs. XHB.TOXCBG.TO vs. ZMMK.TOXCBG.TO vs. GEQT.TOXCBG.TO vs. XSTH.TOXCBG.TO vs. XSHG.TOXCBG.TO vs. BRHYX
Often compared with ZAG.TO:
ZAG.TO vs. VAB.TOZAG.TO vs. XBB.TOZAG.TO vs. XSB.TOZAG.TO vs. ZST.TOZAG.TO vs. ZMMK.TOZAG.TO vs. XBBZAG.TO vs. XCB.TO

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XCBG.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than ZAG.TO's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF

Return for Risk

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XCBG.TO
XCBG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCBG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO
ZAG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
ZAG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) and BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

XCBG.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.88

0.12

+0.76

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.24

0.19

+1.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.02

+0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.30

+1.11

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

0.60

+4.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XCBG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the ZAG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XCBG.TO and ZAG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

XCBG.TOZAG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

0.12

+0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.09

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.24

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.44

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between XCBG.TO and ZAG.TO is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Dividend Comparison

XCBG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, more than ZAG.TO's 3.48% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XCBG.TO
iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF		3.92%3.84%3.61%3.19%2.99%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ZAG.TO
BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF		3.48%3.48%3.44%3.47%3.56%3.04%2.88%3.03%2.92%2.95%3.07%3.13%

Drawdowns

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XCBG.TO drawdown since its inception was -12.14%, smaller than the maximum ZAG.TO drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XCBG.TO and ZAG.TO.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

XCBG.TOZAG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.14%

-18.03%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.03%

-2.84%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-15.77%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-18.03%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-2.71%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.56%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.61%

1.41%

-0.80%

Volatility

XCBG.TO vs. ZAG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Advanced Canadian Corporate Bond Index ETF (XCBG.TO) is 1.32%, while BMO Aggregate Bond Index ETF (ZAG.TO) has a volatility of 1.90%. This indicates that XCBG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

XCBG.TOZAG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

1.90%

-0.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.05%

2.96%

-0.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.08%

4.65%

-1.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.22%

6.53%

-2.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.22%

7.09%

-2.87%