XC vs. USFR
Compare and contrast key facts about WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR).
XC and USFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XC is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Sep 20, 2022. USFR is a passively managed fund by WisdomTree that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. It was launched on Feb 4, 2014. Both XC and USFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XC vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XC vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | -3.53% | 18.19% | 5.49% | 21.31% | 1.49% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 0.93% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 0.99% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XC achieves a -3.53% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 0.93% return.
XC
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- -8.43%
- YTD
- -3.53%
- 6M
- 0.10%
- 1Y
- 17.84%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 2.02%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- 2.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XC vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XC has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XC vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
XC
USFR
XC vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) and WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.07 | 14.37 | -13.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 42.77 | -41.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 10.64 | -9.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 103.73 | -102.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.13 | 661.88 | -656.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 14.37 | -13.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 8.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 3.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 1.57 | -0.81 |
Correlation
The correlation between XC and USFR is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XC vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
XC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.42%, more than USFR's 4.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XC WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund | 12.42% | 11.74% | 1.49% | 1.42% | 0.57% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USFR WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 4.00% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% |
Drawdowns
XC vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XC drawdown since its inception was -20.97%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XC and USFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.97% | -1.36% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.47% | -0.04% | -12.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -0.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.41% | 0.00% | -9.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | -0.16% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 0.01% | +3.38% |
Volatility
XC vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree Emerging Markets ex-China Fund (XC) has a higher volatility of 7.82% compared to WisdomTree Bloomberg Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.09%. This indicates that XC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XC | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 0.09% | +7.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.76% | 0.19% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.80% | 0.29% | +16.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 0.41% | +15.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.73% | 0.81% | +14.92% |