PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBTY vs. TSLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBTY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XBTY having a -19.17% return and TSLR slightly lower at -19.92%.


XBTY

1D
-2.23%
1M
-7.49%
YTD
-19.17%
6M
-19.19%
1Y
-35.32%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLR

1D
3.94%
1M
15.15%
YTD
-19.92%
6M
-13.78%
1Y
10.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBTY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
XBTY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF
-19.17%-21.15%
TSLR
GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF
-19.92%42.69%

Correlation

The correlation between XBTY and TSLR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBTY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBTY
XBTY Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
XBTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBTY Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
XBTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBTY Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLR
TSLR Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TSLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBTY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBTYTSLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-1.25

0.11

-1.36

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.78

0.82

-2.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.79

1.10

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.78

0.15

-0.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.20

0.30

-1.51

XBTY vs. TSLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBTY Sharpe Ratio is -1.25, which is lower than the TSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBTY and TSLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBTYTSLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.25

0.11

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.25

0.00

-1.25

Drawdowns

XBTY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and TSLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBTYTSLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.23%

-82.80%

+37.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.23%

-54.37%

+9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.23%

-59.02%

+13.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.95%

-50.23%

+27.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.35%

26.37%

+2.98%

Volatility

XBTY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is 5.55%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that XBTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBTYTSLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

24.39%

-18.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.20%

54.65%

-36.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

92.77%

-64.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.01%

115.63%

-87.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.01%

115.63%

-87.62%

XBTY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBTY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison

XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.89%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBTY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLR has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to XBTY (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -45.23% vs TSLR's -82.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 10.10% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, XBTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 10.10% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XBTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.

XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.

XBTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 1.50% for TSLR.

TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBTY and TSLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer