XBTY vs. TSLR
XBTY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF) and TSLR (GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBTY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSLR is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, XBTY returned -35.32% vs 10.10% for TSLR. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBTY charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for TSLR.
Performance
XBTY vs. TSLR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XBTY having a -19.17% return and TSLR slightly lower at -19.92%.
XBTY
- 1D
- -2.23%
- 1M
- -7.49%
- YTD
- -19.17%
- 6M
- -19.19%
- 1Y
- -35.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSLR
- 1D
- 3.94%
- 1M
- 15.15%
- YTD
- -19.92%
- 6M
- -13.78%
- 1Y
- 10.10%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBTY vs. TSLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | -19.17% | -21.15% |
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | -19.92% | 42.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBTY and TSLR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBTY vs. TSLR — Risk / Return Rank
XBTY
TSLR
XBTY vs. TSLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) and GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | 0.11 | -1.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | 0.82 | -2.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.79 | 1.10 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.78 | 0.15 | -0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.20 | 0.30 | -1.51 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.25 | 0.11 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.25 | 0.00 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
XBTY vs. TSLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBTY drawdown since its inception was -45.23%, smaller than the maximum TSLR drawdown of -82.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBTY and TSLR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.23% | -82.80% | +37.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -45.23% | -54.37% | +9.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.23% | -59.02% | +13.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.95% | -50.23% | +27.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.35% | 26.37% | +2.98% |
Volatility
XBTY vs. TSLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF (XBTY) is 5.55%, while GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLR) has a volatility of 24.39%. This indicates that XBTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBTY | TSLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.55% | 24.39% | -18.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.20% | 54.65% | -36.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.34% | 92.77% | -64.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.01% | 115.63% | -87.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.01% | 115.63% | -87.62% |
XBTY vs. TSLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBTY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLR's 1.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBTY vs. TSLR - Dividend Comparison
XBTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 239.89%, while TSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
TSLR GraniteShares 2x Long TSLA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XBTY GraniteShares YieldBOOST Bitcoin ETF | 239.89% | 102.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBTY and TSLR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLR has higher volatility (24.39%) compared to XBTY (5.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBTY dropped -45.23% vs TSLR's -82.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSLR leads with 10.10% vs -35.32% for XBTY. On fees, XBTY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, XBTY has been the lower-risk option at 5.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLR has performed better with a 10.10% return vs -35.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBTY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for TSLR.
XBTY has the higher dividend yield at 239.89%, compared with 0.00% for TSLR.
XBTY is categorized as Derivative Income, while TSLR is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for XBTY and 1.50% for TSLR.
TSLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBTY and TSLR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer