XBOC vs. NVDO
XBOC (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October) and NVDO (Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XBOC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for NVDO.
Performance
XBOC vs. NVDO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBOC achieves a 5.40% return, which is significantly lower than NVDO's 18.85% return.
XBOC
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 13.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.67%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDO
- 1D
- -2.46%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 18.85%
- 6M
- 29.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBOC vs. NVDO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XBOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October | 5.40% | 3.53% |
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 18.85% | 11.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBOC and NVDO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2025 | 0.52 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBOC vs. NVDO — Risk / Return Rank
XBOC
NVDO
XBOC vs. NVDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October (XBOC) and Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF (NVDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBOC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.85 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBOC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.30 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
XBOC vs. NVDO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBOC drawdown since its inception was -13.35%, smaller than the maximum NVDO drawdown of -16.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBOC and NVDO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBOC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.35% | -16.25% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -2.68% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.08% | -4.99% | +2.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
XBOC vs. NVDO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBOC | NVDO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.19% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.41% | 31.93% | -25.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 31.93% | -22.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.90% | 31.93% | -22.03% |
XBOC vs. NVDO - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBOC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDO's 0.77% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBOC vs. NVDO - Dividend Comparison
XBOC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NVDO Leverage Shares 2x Capped Accelerated NVDA Monthly ETF | 14.02% | 16.66% |
XBOC Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - October | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBOC and NVDO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDO is cheaper at 0.77% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDO is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBOC.
NVDO has the higher dividend yield at 14.02%, compared with 0.00% for XBOC.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBOC and 0.77% for NVDO.
Find the right allocation for XBOC and NVDO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer