PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBM.TO vs. XLE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBM.TO is traded in CAD, while XLE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XBM.TO having a 31.10% return and XLE slightly higher at 32.19%. Over the past 10 years, XBM.TO has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 19.65%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.


XBM.TO

1D
2.73%
1M
6.67%
YTD
31.10%
6M
38.65%
1Y
104.78%
3Y*
26.59%
5Y*
17.84%
10Y*
19.65%

XLE

1D
0.94%
1M
1.04%
YTD
32.19%
6M
30.20%
1Y
38.57%
3Y*
17.92%
5Y*
23.64%
10Y*
10.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
31.10%50.69%5.96%2.84%3.63%27.94%31.53%9.95%-22.42%32.48%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.19%2.95%14.50%-2.99%74.74%53.20%-34.27%7.14%-11.34%-7.60%

Correlation

The correlation between XBM.TO and XLE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between XBM.TO and XLE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XBM.TO
XLE

Basic Materials

99.8%

-

Industrials

0.2%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

XBM.TO
99.8%
XLE

-

Industrials

XBM.TO
0.2%
XLE

-

Communication Services

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Consumer Cyclical

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Consumer Defensive

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Energy

XBM.TO

-

XLE
100.0%

Financial Services

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Healthcare

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Real Estate

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Technology

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Utilities

XBM.TO

-

XLE

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBM.TO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBM.TO
XBM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBM.TOXLEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.32

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.35

3.11

+1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.08

8.94

+7.14

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the XLE Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBM.TO and XLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.53%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -63.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBM.TO and XLE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBM.TOXLEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.53%

-63.49%

-4.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.88%

-13.01%

-10.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.45%

-19.75%

-17.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.57%

-23.40%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.25%

-63.49%

+6.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.34%

-7.21%

-1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.09%

-13.65%

-12.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.46%

4.52%

+1.94%

Volatility

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison

iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.50%. This indicates that XBM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBM.TOXLEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.03%

7.50%

+9.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.15%

17.34%

+14.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.63%

20.96%

+16.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.55%

26.59%

+6.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.88%

30.10%

+2.78%

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBM.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBM.TO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison

XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XBM.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF
0.65%0.86%1.25%2.09%4.78%3.05%1.81%3.73%3.38%1.65%2.41%5.75%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.59%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBM.TO and XLE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XBM.TO.

XBM.TO tracks Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XBM.TO and 0.08% for XLE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBM.TO and XLE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer