XBM.TO vs. XLE
XBM.TO (iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - XBM.TO tracks the Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD while XLE tracks the Energy Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XBM.TO returned 19.65%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for XLE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBM.TO charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XBM.TO is traded in CAD, while XLE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XLE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with XBM.TO having a 31.10% return and XLE slightly higher at 32.19%. Over the past 10 years, XBM.TO has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 19.65%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 10.85% annualized return.
XBM.TO
- 1D
- 2.73%
- 1M
- 6.67%
- YTD
- 31.10%
- 6M
- 38.65%
- 1Y
- 104.78%
- 3Y*
- 26.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.84%
- 10Y*
- 19.65%
XLE
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 32.19%
- 6M
- 30.20%
- 1Y
- 38.57%
- 3Y*
- 17.92%
- 5Y*
- 23.64%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF | 31.10% | 50.69% | 5.96% | 2.84% | 3.63% | 27.94% | 31.53% | 9.95% | -22.42% | 32.48% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 32.19% | 2.95% | 14.50% | -2.99% | 74.74% | 53.20% | -34.27% | 7.14% | -11.34% | -7.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBM.TO and XLE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2011 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XBM.TO and XLE has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XBM.TO
XLE
Basic Materials
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XBM.TO
XLE
-
Industrials
XBM.TO
XLE
-
Communication Services
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Consumer Cyclical
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Consumer Defensive
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Energy
XBM.TO
-
XLE
Financial Services
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Healthcare
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Real Estate
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Technology
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Utilities
XBM.TO
-
XLE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBM.TO vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
XBM.TO
XLE
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBM.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.32 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 3.11 | +1.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.08 | 8.94 | +7.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBM.TO drawdown since its inception was -67.53%, which is greater than XLE's maximum drawdown of -63.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBM.TO and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBM.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.53% | -63.49% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.88% | -13.01% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.45% | -19.75% | -17.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.57% | -23.40% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.25% | -63.49% | +6.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -7.21% | -1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.09% | -13.65% | -12.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.46% | 4.52% | +1.94% |
Volatility
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF (XBM.TO) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 7.50%. This indicates that XBM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBM.TO | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.03% | 7.50% | +9.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.15% | 17.34% | +14.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.63% | 20.96% | +16.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.55% | 26.59% | +6.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 30.10% | +2.78% |
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBM.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBM.TO vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
XBM.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than XLE's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBM.TO iShares S&P/TSX Global Base Metals Index ETF | 0.65% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 2.09% | 4.78% | 3.05% | 1.81% | 3.73% | 3.38% | 1.65% | 2.41% | 5.75% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBM.TO and XLE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XBM.TO.
XBM.TO tracks Morningstar Can Natural Resource NR CAD, while XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for XBM.TO and 0.08% for XLE.
Find the right allocation for XBM.TO and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer