PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBLC.L vs. IBIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBLC.L is traded in EUR, while IBIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IBIT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBLC.L achieves a 0.55% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -26.63% return.


XBLC.L

1D
0.10%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.55%
6M
0.44%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
4.55%
5Y*
0.08%
10Y*

IBIT

1D
-2.78%
1M
-21.65%
YTD
-26.63%
6M
-31.22%
1Y
-40.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
XBLC.L
Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C
0.55%2.95%5.47%
IBIT
iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF
-26.63%-17.52%111.13%

Correlation

The correlation between XBLC.L and IBIT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBLC.L vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBLC.L
XBLC.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBLC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIT
IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBLC.LIBITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.85

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

-0.82

+1.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.42

-1.43

+3.85

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBLC.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.62, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBLC.L and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBLC.LIBITDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

-0.94

+1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.22

-0.04

Drawdowns

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBLC.L drawdown since its inception was -17.18%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -49.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBLC.L and IBIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBLC.LIBITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-49.64%

+32.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.67%

-49.64%

+46.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-49.04%

+47.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-16.49%

+11.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

28.49%

-27.72%

Volatility

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers II EUR Corporate Bond UCITS ETF 1C (XBLC.L) is 1.18%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 9.09%. This indicates that XBLC.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBLC.LIBITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.18%

9.09%

-7.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.65%

33.74%

-31.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.01%

43.44%

-40.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.38%

50.17%

-45.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.71%

50.17%

-45.46%

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBLC.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XBLC.L vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBLC.L nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBLC.L and IBIT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBLC.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBLC.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.

XBLC.L is categorized as European Corporate Bonds, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. XBLC.L tracks Bloomberg Euro Corp TR EUR, while IBIT tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XBLC.L and 0.25% for IBIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBLC.L and IBIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer