XBJA vs. FAAR
XBJA (Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBJA is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Innovator, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBJA returned 11.26%/yr vs 10.57%/yr for FAAR. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. XBJA charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
XBJA vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBJA achieves a 4.94% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.
XBJA
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 4.94%
- 6M
- 5.07%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.26%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -5.21%
- YTD
- 19.14%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 28.33%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.72%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
XBJA vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January | 4.94% | 11.12% | 11.68% | 17.62% | -11.58% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 19.14% | 8.07% | 5.97% | -5.63% | 10.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBJA and FAAR is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2022 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBJA vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
XBJA
FAAR
XBJA vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBJA | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.52 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.05 | 15.18 | -1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBJA vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBJA drawdown since its inception was -17.42%, roughly equal to the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBJA and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBJA | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.42% | -18.03% | +0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.33% | -6.29% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.57% | -11.54% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -6.29% | +5.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.11% | -7.82% | +4.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.87% | -0.95% |
Volatility
XBJA vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January (XBJA) is 1.65%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that XBJA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBJA | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | 2.55% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.37% | 9.68% | -4.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.92% | 13.38% | -7.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 12.96% | -1.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.54% | 11.54% | 0.00% |
XBJA vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBJA has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBJA vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
XBJA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.66% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
XBJA Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - January | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBJA and FAAR have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to XBJA (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBJA dropped -17.42% vs FAAR's -18.03%.
On 3-year performance, XBJA leads with 11.26% vs 10.57% for FAAR. On fees, XBJA is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, XBJA has been the lower-risk option at 1.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, XBJA has performed better with a 11.26% return vs 10.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XBJA is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.00% for XBJA.
XBJA is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for XBJA and 0.95% for FAAR.
XBJA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XBJA and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer