PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBIT vs. ^XNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBIT achieves a -6.69% return, which is significantly lower than ^XNG's 20.98% return. Over the past 10 years, XBIT has underperformed ^XNG with an annualized return of -15.23%, while ^XNG has yielded a comparatively higher 4.12% annualized return.


XBIT

1D
-0.45%
1M
-3.04%
6M
-11.16%
YTD
-6.69%
1Y
-21.75%
3Y*
-25.25%
5Y*
-32.74%
10Y*
-15.23%
ALL TIME*
-17.59%

^XNG

1D
0.57%
1M
3.65%
6M
12.84%
YTD
20.98%
1Y
23.54%
3Y*
14.96%
5Y*
17.85%
10Y*
4.12%
ALL TIME*
5.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$97.46K$97.91K$78.84K

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBIT
XBiotech Inc.
-6.69%-39.49%-1.25%13.96%-68.46%-17.46%-16.15%267.42%28.93%-61.07%
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
20.98%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XBIT and ^XNG is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2015

0.16

The correlation between XBIT and ^XNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBIT vs. ^XNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XBIT
XBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
XBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
XBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XBIT^XNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.23

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.90

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.80

4.52

-5.32

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.49, which is lower than the ^XNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBIT and ^XNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIT drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than ^XNG's maximum drawdown of -84.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIT and ^XNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBIT^XNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-84.52%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.43%

-11.79%

-27.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.56%

-14.10%

-64.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.07%

-25.27%

-61.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.13%

-77.64%

-12.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.78%

-11.68%

-80.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.38%

-27.22%

-43.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.93%

4.96%

+23.97%

Volatility

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Volatility Comparison

XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) at 5.53%. This indicates that XBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBIT^XNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

5.53%

+1.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.99%

13.09%

+5.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.14%

16.36%

+30.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.83%

21.57%

+42.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

73.25%

28.66%

+44.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBIT and ^XNG have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBIT has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to ^XNG (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBIT dropped -92.67% vs ^XNG's -84.52%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBIT and ^XNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer