PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBIT vs. ^XNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBIT achieves a -0.84% return, which is significantly lower than ^XNG's 19.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XBIT has underperformed ^XNG with an annualized return of -16.62%, while ^XNG has yielded a comparatively higher 3.71% annualized return.


XBIT

1D
-0.84%
1M
-7.06%
YTD
-0.84%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
-19.39%
3Y*
-24.92%
5Y*
-30.49%
10Y*
-16.62%

^XNG

1D
0.92%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
19.47%
6M
14.72%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
15.69%
10Y*
3.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBIT
XBiotech Inc.
-0.84%-39.49%-1.25%13.96%-68.46%-17.46%-16.15%267.42%28.93%-61.07%
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
19.47%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XBIT and ^XNG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2015

0.16

The correlation between XBIT and ^XNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.17 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBIT vs. ^XNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBIT
XBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
XBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
XBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) and NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBIT^XNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.35

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.97

1.26

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.30

-2.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

6.69

-7.44

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBIT Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the ^XNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBIT and ^XNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBIT^XNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.38

1.53

-1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.48

0.72

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.22

0.13

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.23

0.21

-0.43

Drawdowns

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIT drawdown since its inception was -92.67%, which is greater than ^XNG's maximum drawdown of -84.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIT and ^XNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBIT^XNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.67%

-84.52%

-8.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.43%

-10.29%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.56%

-14.10%

-64.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.21%

-25.27%

-61.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.72%

-77.64%

-13.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.27%

-12.78%

-78.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-27.28%

-42.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.92%

3.53%

+22.39%

Volatility

XBIT vs. ^XNG - Volatility Comparison

XBiotech Inc. (XBIT) has a higher volatility of 6.88% compared to NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) at 6.17%. This indicates that XBIT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^XNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBIT^XNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

6.17%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.26%

12.48%

+14.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.89%

15.59%

+36.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.04%

21.81%

+42.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.31%

29.08%

+46.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


XBIT and ^XNG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XBIT has higher volatility (6.88%) compared to ^XNG (6.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBIT dropped -92.67% vs ^XNG's -84.52%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBIT and ^XNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer