PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
^XNG vs. BOIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

^XNG vs. BOIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ^XNG achieves a 18.19% return, which is significantly higher than BOIL's -50.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ^XNG has outperformed BOIL with an annualized return of 3.59%, while BOIL has yielded a comparatively lower -58.61% annualized return.


^XNG

1D
-1.15%
1M
1.56%
6M
17.12%
YTD
18.19%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
15.84%
5Y*
17.19%
10Y*
3.59%

BOIL

1D
1.21%
1M
-15.70%
6M
-31.39%
YTD
-50.66%
1Y
-76.23%
3Y*
-66.03%
5Y*
-68.41%
10Y*
-58.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

^XNG vs. BOIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
^XNG
NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index
18.19%9.44%16.55%2.82%22.57%54.17%-17.49%-3.37%-32.78%-15.65%
BOIL
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas
-50.66%-58.98%-60.75%-92.00%-31.85%23.84%-74.74%-67.70%-20.55%-65.72%

Correlation

The correlation between ^XNG and BOIL is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2011

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

^XNG vs. BOIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

^XNG
^XNG Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
^XNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^XNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
^XNG Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
^XNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
^XNG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BOIL
BOIL Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
BOIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BOIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
BOIL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
BOIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
BOIL Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

^XNG vs. BOIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) and ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


^XNGBOILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

0.88

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

-0.98

+2.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.50

-1.38

+5.88

^XNG vs. BOIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ^XNG Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the BOIL Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ^XNG and BOIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

^XNG vs. BOIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ^XNG drawdown since its inception was -84.52%, smaller than the maximum BOIL drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ^XNG and BOIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


^XNGBOILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.52%

-100.00%

+15.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.79%

-77.83%

+66.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-97.17%

+83.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.27%

-99.92%

+74.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.64%

-99.99%

+22.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.71%

-100.00%

+86.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.25%

-93.61%

+66.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.71%

55.33%

-50.62%

Volatility

^XNG vs. BOIL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NYSE Arca Natural Gas Index (^XNG) is 5.56%, while ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Natural Gas (BOIL) has a volatility of 19.61%. This indicates that ^XNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BOIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


^XNGBOILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.56%

19.61%

-14.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

100.30%

-87.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.24%

111.85%

-95.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

119.03%

-97.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.71%

101.74%

-73.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


^XNG and BOIL have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BOIL has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to ^XNG (5.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ^XNG dropped -84.52% vs BOIL's -100.00%.

^XNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ^XNG and BOIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer