XBIL vs. CUSD

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

XBIL (US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF) and CUSD (CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. XBIL is passively managed, while CUSD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, XBIL returned 4.60%/yr vs 5.80%/yr for CUSD. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XBIL charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.81%/yr for CUSD.

Performance

XBIL vs. CUSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBIL achieves a 1.57% return, which is significantly lower than CUSD's 4.97% return.

XBIL

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 1.57%
• 6M: 1.67%
• 1Y: 3.82%
• 3Y*: 4.60%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CUSD

• 1D: 3.80%
• 1M: 3.10%
• YTD: 4.97%
• 6M: 5.87%
• 1Y: 6.58%
• 3Y*: 5.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBIL vs. CUSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF	1.57%	4.17%	5.16%	4.28%
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	4.97%	5.02%	4.57%	4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between XBIL and CUSD is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2023	0.02

Return for Risk

XBIL vs. CUSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBIL

XBIL Risk / Return Rank: 100
XBIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Omega Ratio Rank: 99
XBIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
XBIL Martin Ratio Rank: 100

CUSD

CUSD Risk / Return Rank: 20
CUSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
CUSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CUSD Omega Ratio Rank: 19
CUSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
CUSD Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBIL vs. CUSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) and CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XBIL	CUSD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.56	0.45	+12.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	38.47	0.80	+37.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	10.10	1.13	+8.97
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	64.01	1.22	+62.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	592.11	3.09	+589.03

XBIL vs. CUSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBIL Sharpe Ratio is 12.56, which is higher than the CUSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBIL and CUSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XBIL vs. CUSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum CUSD drawdown of -5.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBIL and CUSD.

Drawdown Indicators

	XBIL	CUSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-5.42%	+5.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.06%	-5.42%	+5.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.07%	-5.42%	+5.35%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.48%	+0.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	2.14%	-2.13%

Volatility

XBIL vs. CUSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF (XBIL) is 0.12%, while CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF (CUSD) has a volatility of 6.15%. This indicates that XBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CUSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XBIL	CUSD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.12%	6.15%	-6.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.19%	11.99%	-11.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31%	14.64%	-14.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.38%	7.39%	-7.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.38%	7.39%	-7.01%

XBIL vs. CUSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBIL has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CUSD's 0.81% expense ratio.

Dividends

XBIL vs. CUSD - Dividend Comparison

XBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than CUSD's 13.39% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CUSD CrossingBridge Ultra-Short Duration ETF	13.39%	14.05%	7.10%	3.62%	1.14%
XBIL US Treasury 6 Month Bill ETF	3.76%	4.01%	4.90%	4.30%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XBIL and CUSD in my portfolio?

XBIL and CUSD have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XBIL or CUSD?

CUSD has higher volatility (6.15%) compared to XBIL (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XBIL dropped -0.08% vs CUSD's -5.42%.

Which ETF is better, XBIL or CUSD?

On 3-year performance, CUSD leads with 5.80% vs 4.60% for XBIL. On fees, XBIL is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, XBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XBIL or CUSD?

Over the 3-year period, CUSD has performed better with a 5.80% return vs 4.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XBIL or CUSD?

XBIL is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.81% for CUSD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XBIL or CUSD?

CUSD has the higher dividend yield at 13.39%, compared with 3.76% for XBIL.

What is the main difference between XBIL and CUSD?

They also come from different issuers: US Benchmark Series and CrossingBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for XBIL and 0.81% for CUSD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (12.56 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.