PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

XBCU.L is traded in USD, while CXAP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CXAP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XBCU.L achieves a 23.15% return, which is significantly lower than CXAP.L's 25.04% return. Over the past 10 years, XBCU.L has underperformed CXAP.L with an annualized return of 9.95%, while CXAP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.


XBCU.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
0.54%
YTD
23.15%
6M
26.23%
1Y
45.54%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
9.95%

CXAP.L

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.57%
YTD
25.04%
6M
27.82%
1Y
43.46%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
11.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XBCU.L
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C
23.15%26.09%8.64%-9.97%20.96%39.63%-1.34%7.54%-11.30%5.31%
CXAP.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
25.04%18.99%6.86%-5.88%14.04%35.55%-2.02%11.45%-11.34%15.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XBCU.L and CXAP.L is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2016

0.84

The correlation between XBCU.L and CXAP.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XBCU.L
CXAP.L

Technology

41.0%
32.6%

Communication Services

16.1%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.9%
3.9%

Industrials

9.4%
14.6%

Healthcare

6.1%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
10.6%

Financial Services

4.2%
12.6%

Real Estate

3.4%
0.2%

Energy

3.4%
2.9%

Basic Materials

1.4%
1.4%

Utilities

1.1%
4.4%

Technology

XBCU.L
41.0%
CXAP.L
32.6%

Communication Services

XBCU.L
16.1%
CXAP.L
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

XBCU.L
9.9%
CXAP.L
3.9%

Industrials

XBCU.L
9.4%
CXAP.L
14.6%

Healthcare

XBCU.L
6.1%
CXAP.L
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

XBCU.L
5.1%
CXAP.L
10.6%

Financial Services

XBCU.L
4.2%
CXAP.L
12.6%

Real Estate

XBCU.L
3.4%
CXAP.L
0.2%

Energy

XBCU.L
3.4%
CXAP.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

XBCU.L
1.4%
CXAP.L
1.4%

Utilities

XBCU.L
1.1%
CXAP.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XBCU.L
XBCU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBCU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBCU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XBCU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBCU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CXAP.L
CXAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XBCU.LCXAP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.50

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.85

6.41

-1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.65

18.98

-5.34

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XBCU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XBCU.L and CXAP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XBCU.LCXAP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

2.86

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

0.78

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.67

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.69

-0.42

Drawdowns

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCU.L drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than CXAP.L's maximum drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCU.L and CXAP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCU.LCXAP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.92%

-36.00%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.34%

-6.75%

-2.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.95%

-12.96%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.83%

-22.98%

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.15%

-36.00%

-1.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-2.24%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.73%

-9.09%

-20.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

2.28%

+1.05%

Volatility

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) is 4.24%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) has a volatility of 4.55%. This indicates that XBCU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CXAP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCU.LCXAP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

4.55%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

12.96%

+2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.83%

15.13%

+2.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.65%

17.21%

+1.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.52%

16.48%

+0.04%

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XBCU.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than CXAP.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

XBCU.L vs. CXAP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XBCU.L nor CXAP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


XBCU.L and CXAP.L have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XBCU.L is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBCU.L is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for CXAP.L.

XBCU.L tracks Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward, while CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped. They also come from different issuers: DWS and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for XBCU.L and 0.34% for CXAP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCU.L and CXAP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer