PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CXAP.L achieves a 26.11% return, which is significantly lower than WCOB.L's 32.82% return.


CXAP.L

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.80%
YTD
26.11%
6M
27.55%
1Y
45.63%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
14.88%
10Y*
12.08%

WCOB.L

1D
0.89%
1M
0.71%
YTD
32.82%
6M
33.03%
1Y
46.58%
3Y*
14.00%
5Y*
13.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CXAP.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc
26.11%10.65%8.67%-10.60%27.69%36.79%-4.93%7.15%-6.02%6.26%
WCOB.L
WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc
32.82%7.73%4.50%-12.06%25.92%28.89%-3.11%3.86%-3.43%-3.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CXAP.L and WCOB.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2017

0.66

Over the past year, CXAP.L and WCOB.L have become more correlated (0.90) than their long-term average of 0.66, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CXAP.L
CXAP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CXAP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WCOB.L
WCOB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCOB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) and WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CXAP.LWCOB.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.92

2.64

+0.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.74

3.31

+0.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.82

6.64

+1.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

20.28

16.86

+3.41

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CXAP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.92, which is comparable to the WCOB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CXAP.L and WCOB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CXAP.LWCOB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.92

2.64

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.85

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.67

+0.09

Drawdowns

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CXAP.L drawdown since its inception was -31.30%, which is greater than WCOB.L's maximum drawdown of -27.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CXAP.L and WCOB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CXAP.LWCOB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.30%

-27.14%

-4.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-6.98%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.43%

-13.74%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-27.14%

+5.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.91%

-2.60%

+1.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.24%

-11.71%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.75%

-0.53%

Volatility

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (USD) A-acc (CXAP.L) is 4.57%, while WisdomTree Enhanced Commodity UCITS ETF USD Acc (WCOB.L) has a volatility of 5.76%. This indicates that CXAP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WCOB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CXAP.LWCOB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.57%

5.76%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

15.30%

-2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.68%

17.55%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

15.37%

+0.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.05%

15.90%

+0.15%

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CXAP.L has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than WCOB.L's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CXAP.L vs. WCOB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CXAP.L nor WCOB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CXAP.L and WCOB.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CXAP.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CXAP.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WCOB.L.

CXAP.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex Agriculture Ex Livestock Capped, while WCOB.L tracks Optimised Roll Commodity. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for CXAP.L and 0.35% for WCOB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CXAP.L and WCOB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer