XBCU.L vs. UCIB
Compare and contrast key facts about Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB).
XBCU.L and UCIB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XBCU.L is a passively managed fund by DWS that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg ex-Agriculture and Livestock 15/30 Capped 3 Month Forward. It was launched on Apr 9, 2010. UCIB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the UBS Bloomberg CMCI Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. Both XBCU.L and UCIB are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XBCU.L Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C | 15.88% | 26.09% | 8.64% | -9.97% | 20.96% | 39.63% | -1.34% | 7.54% | -11.30% | 5.31% |
UCIB ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B | 17.48% | 8.97% | 6.58% | -2.26% | 18.24% | 37.34% | 1.10% | 10.86% | -9.48% | 5.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XBCU.L achieves a 15.88% return, which is significantly lower than UCIB's 17.48% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XBCU.L having a 10.62% annualized return and UCIB not far behind at 10.41%.
XBCU.L
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- YTD
- 15.88%
- 6M
- 28.73%
- 1Y
- 30.53%
- 3Y*
- 15.02%
- 5Y*
- 16.99%
- 10Y*
- 10.62%
UCIB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 7.33%
- YTD
- 17.48%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- 1Y
- 23.92%
- 3Y*
- 10.68%
- 5Y*
- 14.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCU.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than UCIB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
XBCU.L vs. UCIB — Risk / Return Rank
XBCU.L
UCIB
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) and ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XBCU.L | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.56 | 1.08 | +0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.00 | 1.50 | +0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.26 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | 2.16 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.53 | 6.17 | +2.36 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCU.L | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.08 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 | 0.59 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.48 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.40 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCU.L and UCIB is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Dividend Comparison
Neither XBCU.L nor UCIB has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCU.L drawdown since its inception was -62.92%, which is greater than UCIB's maximum drawdown of -36.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCU.L and UCIB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCU.L | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.92% | -36.94% | -25.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -11.17% | -1.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.83% | -20.95% | -6.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.15% | -36.94% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.38% | -0.86% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.03% | -9.11% | -20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.59% | 3.91% | -0.32% |
Volatility
XBCU.L vs. UCIB - Volatility Comparison
Xtrackers Bloomberg Commodity ex-Agriculture & Livestock Swap UCITS ETF 2C (XBCU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.69% compared to ETRACS CMCI Total Return ETN Series B (UCIB) at 5.11%. This indicates that XBCU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XBCU.L | UCIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.69% | 5.11% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.45% | 15.71% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 22.28% | -2.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.72% | 24.02% | -5.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 21.62% | -5.08% |