PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XBCI vs. XQQI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XBCI vs. XQQI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XBCI

1D
-3.22%
1M
3.82%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

XQQI

1D
1.25%
1M
-4.84%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.48M$3.42M$5.46M
$11.42M$14.18M$14.54M

XBCI vs. XQQI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XBCI and XQQI is 0.55, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026

0.55

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XBCI vs. XQQI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Boosted Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (XQQI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XBCI vs. XQQI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XBCI vs. XQQI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -37.31%, which is greater than XQQI's maximum drawdown of -15.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and XQQI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XBCIXQQIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.31%

-15.48%

-21.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.97%

-10.18%

-20.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.82%

-3.80%

-12.02%

Volatility

XBCI vs. XQQI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XBCIXQQIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.61%

28.32%

+34.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.61%

28.32%

+34.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.61%

28.32%

+34.29%

XBCI vs. XQQI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XBCI and XQQI have an expense ratio of 0.98%.


Dividends

XBCI vs. XQQI - Dividend Comparison

XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.04%, more than XQQI's 10.72% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


XBCI and XQQI have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.98% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XBCI and XQQI have the same expense ratio: 0.98% per year.

XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 26.04%, compared with 10.72% for XQQI.

XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while XQQI is Nasdaq-100.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XBCI and XQQI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer