XBCI vs. PBTP
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XBCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). XBCI is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
XBCI vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -5.86%
- 1M
- -29.49%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 1.44%
- 6M
- 1.50%
- 1Y
- 3.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -28.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 0.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and PBTP is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
XBCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PBTP
XBCI vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XBCI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.73 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.49% | -5.44% | -30.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.49% | -0.71% | -34.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.73% | -0.75% | -10.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.22% | — |
Volatility
XBCI vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.63% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.60% | 1.62% | +65.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.60% | 2.85% | +64.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.60% | 2.64% | +64.96% |
XBCI vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.54%, more than PBTP's 4.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 4.82% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 23.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and PBTP have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 23.54%, compared with 4.82% for PBTP.
XBCI is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.07% for PBTP.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer