XBCI vs. NEHI
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and NEHI (NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds from Neos. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.98% expense ratio.
Performance
XBCI vs. NEHI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -4.22%
- 1M
- -28.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NEHI
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -23.11%
- YTD
- -36.78%
- 6M
- -38.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. NEHI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -19.85% |
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | -20.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and NEHI is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. NEHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF (NEHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.73 | -1.10 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. NEHI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -29.12%, smaller than the maximum NEHI drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and NEHI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.12% | -43.46% | +14.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.12% | -43.46% | +14.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.31% | -25.23% | +16.92% |
Volatility
XBCI vs. NEHI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | NEHI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.05% | 57.19% | +9.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 57.19% | +9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.05% | 57.19% | +9.86% |
XBCI vs. NEHI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XBCI and NEHI have an expense ratio of 0.98%.
Dividends
XBCI vs. NEHI - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.42%, less than NEHI's 24.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
NEHI NEOS Ethereum High Income ETF | 24.72% | 2.87% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 21.42% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XBCI and NEHI have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.98% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XBCI and NEHI have the same expense ratio: 0.98% per year.
NEHI has the higher dividend yield at 24.72%, compared with 21.42% for XBCI.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and NEHI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer