XBCI vs. MSBT
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while MSBT is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
XBCI vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -4.70%
- 1M
- -25.10%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -17.76%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -14.08% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -14.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and MSBT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2026 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -34.73%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -26.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.73% | -26.46% | -8.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.48% | -23.99% | -7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.48% | -8.48% | -3.00% |
Volatility
XBCI vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.34% | 37.06% | +30.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.34% | 37.06% | +30.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.34% | 37.06% | +30.28% |
XBCI vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.16%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 22.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, XBCI and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 22.16%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer