XBCI vs. MSBT
XBCI (NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF) and MSBT (Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust) are both Cryptocurrency funds. XBCI is actively managed, while MSBT is passively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XBCI charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for MSBT.
Performance
XBCI vs. MSBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
XBCI
- 1D
- -3.98%
- 1M
- -23.50%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSBT
- 1D
- -2.70%
- 1M
- -18.41%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XBCI vs. MSBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | -11.17% |
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | -8.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between XBCI and MSBT is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2026 | 0.98 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XBCI vs. MSBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF (XBCI) and Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust (MSBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XBCI | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.63 | -1.33 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
XBCI vs. MSBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XBCI drawdown since its inception was -25.99%, which is greater than MSBT's maximum drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XBCI and MSBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XBCI | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.99% | -20.25% | -5.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.99% | -20.25% | -5.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.06% | -3.91% | -4.15% |
Volatility
XBCI vs. MSBT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XBCI | MSBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.08% | 32.92% | +34.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 32.92% | +34.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 67.08% | 32.92% | +34.16% |
XBCI vs. MSBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XBCI has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than MSBT's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
XBCI vs. MSBT - Dividend Comparison
XBCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 20.51%, while MSBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
MSBT Morgan Stanley Bitcoin Trust | 0.00% |
XBCI NEOS Boosted Bitcoin High Income ETF | 20.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, XBCI and MSBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, MSBT is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSBT is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.98% for XBCI.
XBCI has the higher dividend yield at 20.51%, compared with 0.00% for MSBT.
They also come from different issuers: Neos and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.98% for XBCI and 0.14% for MSBT.
Find the right allocation for XBCI and MSBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer